improve result form

results/result_2np_64ants_10iter.out

@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 4 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 7, 174
 Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 110, 225] with cost equal to -258.86.
 Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 77, 9] with cost equal to -525.81.
 Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 240, 67, 53] with cost equal to -474.81.
-Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 8 : [256, 256, 256, 240, 10, 61] with cost equal to -641.58.Process 1 launched on node kyle05.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 8 : [256, 256, 256, 240, 10, 61] with cost equal to -641.58.
+Process 1 launched on node kyle05.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 50, 1] with cost equal to -420.64.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 120, 14] with cost equal to -415.33.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 240, 181, 208] with cost equal to -111.93.

results/result_4np_64ants_10iter.out

@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 144, 246, 1
 Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 110, 71] with cost equal to -370.65.
 Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 17, 237] with cost equal to -494.4.
 Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 8 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 109, 121] with cost equal to -366.96.
-Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 9 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 88, 70] with cost equal to -393.23.Process 2 launched on node kyle03.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 9 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 88, 70] with cost equal to -393.23.
+Process 2 launched on node kyle03.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 144, 117, 147] with cost equal to -222.87.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 173, 224] with cost equal to -288.65.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 2 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 152, 40] with cost equal to -350.37.
@@ -151,7 +152,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 4 on process 2 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 9, 113]
 Path followed at iteration 4 on process 2 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 24, 97] with cost equal to -477.47.
 Path followed at iteration 4 on process 2 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 9, 95] with cost equal to -540.89.
 Path followed at iteration 4 on process 2 by ant 8 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 241, 153] with cost equal to -135.12.
-Path followed at iteration 4 on process 2 by ant 9 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 162, 67] with cost equal to -249.14.Process 1 launched on node kyle02.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 2 by ant 9 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 162, 67] with cost equal to -249.14.
+Process 1 launched on node kyle02.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 144, 246, 68] with cost equal to -244.28.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 24, 121] with cost equal to -586.08.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 100, 107] with cost equal to -282.18.
@@ -225,7 +227,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 4 on process 1 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 26, 17
 Path followed at iteration 4 on process 1 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 44, 234] with cost equal to -354.99.
 Path followed at iteration 4 on process 1 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 126, 124] with cost equal to -279.41.
 Path followed at iteration 4 on process 1 by ant 8 : [256, 256, 256, 240, 249, 84] with cost equal to -175.31.
-Path followed at iteration 4 on process 1 by ant 9 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 125, 67] with cost equal to -277.16.Process 3 launched on node kyle03.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 1 by ant 9 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 125, 67] with cost equal to -277.16.
+Process 3 launched on node kyle03.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 193, 96] with cost equal to -186.95.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 66, 70] with cost equal to -376.9.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 3 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 223, 163] with cost equal to -305.52.

results/result_8np_64ants_10iter.out

@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 96, 127, 16
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 54, 163] with cost equal to -411.26.
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 189, 110] with cost equal to -318.58.
 Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 128, 4, 166] with cost equal to -569.82.
-Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 6, 209] with cost equal to -402.42.Process 1 launched on node kyle02.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 6, 209] with cost equal to -402.42.
+Process 1 launched on node kyle02.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 54, 106] with cost equal to -437.86.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 16, 130] with cost equal to -538.11.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 6, 52] with cost equal to -420.05.
@@ -151,7 +152,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 8 on process 1 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 218, 20
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 1 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 222, 85] with cost equal to -358.02.
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 1 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 144, 251, 242] with cost equal to -113.96.
 Path followed at iteration 9 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 31, 48] with cost equal to -539.3.
-Path followed at iteration 9 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 130, 30] with cost equal to -333.48.Process 3 launched on node kyle03.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 130, 30] with cost equal to -333.48.
+Process 3 launched on node kyle03.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 144, 65, 240] with cost equal to -287.87.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 144, 25, 194] with cost equal to -436.52.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 3 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 15, 214] with cost equal to -493.61.
@@ -225,7 +227,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 8 on process 3 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 240, 164, 1
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 3 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 61, 153] with cost equal to -411.39.
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 3 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 13, 75] with cost equal to -464.57.
 Path followed at iteration 9 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 28, 176] with cost equal to -423.17.
-Path followed at iteration 9 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 64, 250] with cost equal to -393.83.Process 4 launched on node kyle04.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 64, 250] with cost equal to -393.83.
+Process 4 launched on node kyle04.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 176, 91] with cost equal to -363.82.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 23, 110] with cost equal to -526.63.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 4 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 256, 149, 38] with cost equal to -365.26.
@@ -299,7 +302,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 8 on process 4 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 187, 2
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 4 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 28, 73] with cost equal to -491.65.
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 4 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 256, 4, 244] with cost equal to -611.9.
 Path followed at iteration 9 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 167, 110] with cost equal to -223.38.
-Path followed at iteration 9 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 256, 7, 83] with cost equal to -643.11.Process 2 launched on node kyle03.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 256, 7, 83] with cost equal to -643.11.
+Process 2 launched on node kyle03.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 128, 4, 210] with cost equal to -539.51.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 44, 160] with cost equal to -415.05.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 2 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 192, 19, 80] with cost equal to -532.39.
@@ -373,7 +377,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 8 on process 2 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 256, 45, 54
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 2 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 256, 202, 60] with cost equal to -281.88.
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 2 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 144, 231, 62] with cost equal to -268.25.
 Path followed at iteration 9 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 147, 128] with cost equal to -253.42.
-Path followed at iteration 9 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 177, 185] with cost equal to -337.17.Process 7 launched on node kyle05.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 177, 185] with cost equal to -337.17.
+Process 7 launched on node kyle05.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 60, 119] with cost equal to -469.62.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 182, 165] with cost equal to -179.2.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 7 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 52, 129] with cost equal to -462.47.
@@ -447,7 +452,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 8 on process 7 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 7, 72]
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 7 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 94, 212] with cost equal to -188.1.
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 7 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 256, 253, 187] with cost equal to -101.13.
 Path followed at iteration 9 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 24, 248] with cost equal to -530.6.
-Path followed at iteration 9 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 149, 168] with cost equal to -172.56.Process 5 launched on node kyle04.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 149, 168] with cost equal to -172.56.
+Process 5 launched on node kyle04.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 7, 22] with cost equal to -621.04.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 144, 121, 67] with cost equal to -267.71.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 5 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 128, 220, 186] with cost equal to -145.33.
@@ -521,7 +527,8 @@ Path followed at iteration 8 on process 5 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 217, 6
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 5 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 256, 128, 33, 133] with cost equal to -499.74.
 Path followed at iteration 8 on process 5 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 144, 161, 62] with cost equal to -264.98.
 Path followed at iteration 9 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 198, 147] with cost equal to -203.47.
-Path followed at iteration 9 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 112, 210] with cost equal to -300.92.Process 6 launched on node kyle05.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 112, 210] with cost equal to -300.92.
+Process 6 launched on node kyle05.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 143, 237] with cost equal to -282.41.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 157, 109] with cost equal to -323.73.
 Path followed at iteration 0 on process 6 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 217, 113] with cost equal to -192.62.