Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 90561a04 authored by Matthieu Oberon's avatar Matthieu Oberon
Browse files

add results comm times for gatherbcast on 1 process

parent 0cb4a535
Branches
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
results/comm_times/cost_opti_gatherbcast_1np.txt 0 → 100644
+ 10
− 0
View file @ 90561a04
679.03
900.94
901.76
901.76
949.79
949.79
949.79
949.79
949.79
949.79
results/comm_times/gatherbcast_1np 0 → 100644
+ 20
− 0
View file @ 90561a04
At iteration 0 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.03734993934631348 s.
--------------------------
At iteration 1 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.009636640548706055 s.
--------------------------
At iteration 2 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.00824117660522461 s.
--------------------------
At iteration 3 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.007983207702636719 s.
--------------------------
At iteration 4 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.006699800491333008 s.
--------------------------
At iteration 5 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.015251636505126953 s.
--------------------------
At iteration 6 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.007268190383911133 s.
--------------------------
At iteration 7 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.007859230041503906 s.
--------------------------
At iteration 8 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.006657600402832031 s.
--------------------------
At iteration 9 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.006526470184326172 s.
--------------------------
\ No newline at end of file
results/comm_times/result_gatherbcast_1np.out 0 → 100644
+ 659
− 0
View file @ 90561a04
ls: impossible d'accéder à 'src': Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
icpc: remark #10397: optimization reports are generated in *.optrpt files in the output location
icpc: remark #10397: optimization reports are generated in *.optrpt files in the output location
Process 0 launched on node kyle39.
Compiling with OPTIMIZATION: -O3 and simd: avx512
Compiling successful
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 180, 448] with cost equal to -339.56.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 144, 201, 198] with cost equal to -147.65.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 2 : [256, 512, 256, 32, 405, 121] with cost equal to -353.06.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 3 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 405, 32] with cost equal to -268.41.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 4 : [512, 256, 256, 512, 68, 243] with cost equal to -302.3.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 5 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 202, 5] with cost equal to -422.97.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 6 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 237, 178] with cost equal to -302.39.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 7 : [512, 256, 256, 64, 29, 124] with cost equal to -501.04.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 8 : [512, 512, 512, 336, 375, 46] with cost equal to -394.71.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 9 : [256, 512, 512, 208, 341, 493] with cost equal to -179.47.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 10 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 39, 420] with cost equal to -499.77.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 11 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 24, 215] with cost equal to -679.03.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 12 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 160, 223] with cost equal to -131.11.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 13 : [256, 256, 512, 160, 72, 229] with cost equal to -580.76.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 14 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 339, 99] with cost equal to -270.89.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 15 : [256, 512, 512, 64, 312, 464] with cost equal to -351.02.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 16 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 79, 123] with cost equal to -372.29.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 17 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 97, 152] with cost equal to -344.29.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 18 : [512, 256, 512, 464, 158, 477] with cost equal to -186.77.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 19 : [256, 512, 512, 160, 233, 481] with cost equal to -279.38.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 20 : [512, 256, 512, 112, 242, 62] with cost equal to -268.32.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 21 : [512, 512, 512, 304, 89, 392] with cost equal to -524.56.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 22 : [256, 512, 256, 192, 60, 31] with cost equal to -666.52.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 23 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 108, 78] with cost equal to -410.59.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 24 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 143, 177] with cost equal to -325.18.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 25 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 376, 64] with cost equal to -326.37.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 26 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 103, 254] with cost equal to -322.88.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 27 : [256, 512, 512, 16, 92, 445] with cost equal to -417.44.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 28 : [512, 512, 256, 160, 144, 172] with cost equal to -420.56.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 29 : [512, 512, 256, 400, 373, 255] with cost equal to -157.35.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 30 : [256, 512, 256, 32, 255, 108] with cost equal to -407.23.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 31 : [512, 256, 512, 368, 209, 496] with cost equal to -160.57.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 32 : [256, 512, 256, 112, 275, 199] with cost equal to -241.31.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 33 : [512, 512, 256, 400, 448, 144] with cost equal to -200.61.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 34 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 235, 188] with cost equal to -117.51.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 35 : [512, 512, 256, 480, 363, 4] with cost equal to -465.32.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 36 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 240, 104] with cost equal to -249.39.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 37 : [512, 256, 256, 112, 55, 98] with cost equal to -529.09.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 38 : [256, 512, 512, 208, 235, 189] with cost equal to -360.55.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 39 : [512, 256, 512, 240, 230, 258] with cost equal to -338.58.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 40 : [256, 512, 256, 96, 352, 16] with cost equal to -340.6.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 41 : [512, 512, 256, 80, 100, 246] with cost equal to -490.34.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 42 : [256, 256, 512, 144, 42, 352] with cost equal to -599.6.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 43 : [512, 256, 512, 224, 79, 281] with cost equal to -447.09.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 44 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 151, 173] with cost equal to -243.91.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 45 : [512, 256, 256, 96, 253, 54] with cost equal to -335.74.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 46 : [512, 512, 512, 192, 81, 275] with cost equal to -551.51.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 47 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 174, 172] with cost equal to -159.56.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 48 : [256, 512, 512, 192, 264, 484] with cost equal to -222.55.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 49 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 145, 205] with cost equal to -235.39.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 50 : [512, 256, 256, 448, 126, 131] with cost equal to -301.63.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 51 : [512, 256, 256, 304, 245, 48] with cost equal to -314.96.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 52 : [512, 256, 512, 368, 100, 373] with cost equal to -311.84.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 53 : [512, 512, 256, 144, 202, 217] with cost equal to -372.66.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 54 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 150, 229] with cost equal to -295.26.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 55 : [512, 256, 512, 128, 247, 351] with cost equal to -345.59.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 56 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 92, 222] with cost equal to -231.54.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 57 : [512, 512, 512, 32, 361, 49] with cost equal to -370.11.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 58 : [512, 256, 256, 160, 113, 40] with cost equal to -430.53.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 59 : [256, 256, 512, 144, 107, 158] with cost equal to -353.87.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 60 : [512, 512, 256, 400, 445, 197] with cost equal to -151.28.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 61 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 69, 260] with cost equal to -552.14.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 62 : [256, 512, 512, 192, 154, 133] with cost equal to -424.18.
Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 63 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 72, 191] with cost equal to -659.25.
At iteration 0 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.03734993934631348 s.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 217, 486] with cost equal to -298.83.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 66, 246] with cost equal to -385.05.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 2 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 504, 201] with cost equal to -282.27.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 3 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 80, 193] with cost equal to -330.86.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 4 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 28, 4] with cost equal to -566.16.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 5 : [256, 512, 256, 96, 405, 5] with cost equal to -312.29.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 6 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 199, 114] with cost equal to -379.29.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 7 : [512, 256, 256, 32, 86, 32] with cost equal to -360.53.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 8 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 208, 176] with cost equal to -368.95.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 9 : [256, 512, 256, 112, 134, 185] with cost equal to -364.26.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 10 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 71, 203] with cost equal to -245.12.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 11 : [512, 256, 512, 128, 146, 423] with cost equal to -382.87.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 12 : [512, 256, 512, 112, 253, 185] with cost equal to -337.6.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 13 : [512, 512, 512, 240, 184, 72] with cost equal to -386.12.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 14 : [512, 512, 256, 400, 206, 122] with cost equal to -327.78.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 15 : [512, 256, 256, 384, 1, 59] with cost equal to -653.22.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 16 : [512, 512, 256, 64, 444, 85] with cost equal to -346.13.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 17 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 194, 152] with cost equal to -267.21.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 18 : [256, 256, 512, 32, 1, 158] with cost equal to -438.49.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 19 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 258, 132] with cost equal to -339.95.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 20 : [512, 256, 256, 208, 59, 157] with cost equal to -454.93.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 21 : [512, 512, 512, 64, 203, 154] with cost equal to -418.89.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 22 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 233, 92] with cost equal to -320.68.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 23 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 146, 131] with cost equal to -263.83.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 24 : [512, 512, 256, 176, 217, 231] with cost equal to -350.73.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 25 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 460, 221] with cost equal to -129.63.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 26 : [512, 256, 512, 160, 26, 313] with cost equal to -635.49.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 27 : [256, 512, 512, 240, 255, 475] with cost equal to -205.27.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 28 : [512, 256, 256, 304, 170, 178] with cost equal to -208.59.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 29 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 13, 286] with cost equal to -900.94.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 30 : [256, 512, 256, 144, 134, 94] with cost equal to -507.74.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 31 : [512, 256, 256, 32, 36, 109] with cost equal to -470.08.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 32 : [256, 256, 512, 192, 85, 334] with cost equal to -317.19.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 33 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 175, 211] with cost equal to -352.17.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 34 : [512, 256, 512, 144, 101, 3] with cost equal to -426.67.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 35 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 481, 124] with cost equal to -279.0.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 36 : [256, 256, 512, 240, 246, 273] with cost equal to -188.19.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 37 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 402, 155] with cost equal to -295.86.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 38 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 151, 10] with cost equal to -404.51.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 39 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 40, 353] with cost equal to -581.66.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 40 : [512, 512, 512, 368, 479, 422] with cost equal to -149.34.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 41 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 294, 243] with cost equal to -434.58.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 42 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 81, 226] with cost equal to -343.52.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 43 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 382, 78] with cost equal to -306.4.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 44 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 58, 246] with cost equal to -438.76.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 45 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 330, 54] with cost equal to -335.35.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 46 : [512, 512, 256, 336, 391, 5] with cost equal to -369.93.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 47 : [256, 512, 512, 48, 330, 184] with cost equal to -360.67.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 48 : [256, 512, 256, 112, 118, 43] with cost equal to -544.13.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 49 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 134, 38] with cost equal to -398.42.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 50 : [256, 512, 512, 160, 307, 349] with cost equal to -255.6.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 51 : [512, 512, 512, 240, 452, 219] with cost equal to -301.26.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 52 : [512, 256, 512, 208, 46, 444] with cost equal to -535.66.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 53 : [512, 256, 512, 224, 41, 343] with cost equal to -603.54.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 54 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 227, 62] with cost equal to -397.92.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 55 : [512, 256, 256, 272, 90, 1] with cost equal to -370.52.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 56 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 277, 511] with cost equal to -248.7.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 57 : [512, 256, 512, 176, 39, 389] with cost equal to -572.56.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 58 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 196, 203] with cost equal to -346.81.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 59 : [256, 256, 256, 192, 2, 89] with cost equal to -661.72.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 60 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 83, 12] with cost equal to -700.46.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 61 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 104, 135] with cost equal to -587.37.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 62 : [512, 256, 512, 48, 145, 504] with cost equal to -388.21.
Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 63 : [512, 512, 256, 304, 329, 140] with cost equal to -272.42.
At iteration 1 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.009636640548706055 s.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 144, 242] with cost equal to -505.09.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 256, 480, 55, 103] with cost equal to -536.3.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 8, 161] with cost equal to -568.04.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 3 : [512, 512, 512, 160, 391, 42] with cost equal to -329.29.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 4 : [512, 256, 512, 240, 80, 197] with cost equal to -448.68.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 210, 501] with cost equal to -294.03.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 6 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 427, 18] with cost equal to -410.39.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 7 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 91, 151] with cost equal to -503.52.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 8 : [512, 256, 256, 128, 172, 149] with cost equal to -326.75.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 9 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 79, 133] with cost equal to -480.35.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 10 : [512, 512, 512, 304, 102, 129] with cost equal to -447.77.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 11 : [512, 256, 512, 128, 3, 201] with cost equal to -624.5.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 12 : [512, 256, 512, 32, 14, 153] with cost equal to -528.16.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 13 : [512, 512, 512, 112, 444, 469] with cost equal to -306.4.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 14 : [256, 512, 256, 16, 9, 58] with cost equal to -492.16.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 15 : [512, 256, 512, 288, 38, 359] with cost equal to -642.56.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 16 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 120, 55] with cost equal to -381.77.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 17 : [256, 512, 512, 160, 179, 426] with cost equal to -323.03.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 18 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 331, 313] with cost equal to -236.91.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 19 : [512, 256, 256, 336, 48, 74] with cost equal to -554.54.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 20 : [512, 256, 256, 208, 174, 46] with cost equal to -357.68.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 21 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 177, 58] with cost equal to -348.33.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 22 : [256, 512, 512, 192, 150, 373] with cost equal to -343.39.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 23 : [256, 512, 256, 112, 117, 64] with cost equal to -521.4.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 24 : [256, 256, 256, 96, 26, 158] with cost equal to -536.3.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 25 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 212, 59] with cost equal to -331.48.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 26 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 119, 37] with cost equal to -392.14.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 27 : [256, 512, 256, 32, 447, 77] with cost equal to -338.41.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 28 : [256, 512, 256, 32, 424, 143] with cost equal to -339.51.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 29 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 320, 231] with cost equal to -326.14.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 30 : [512, 256, 512, 208, 236, 239] with cost equal to -351.59.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 31 : [256, 512, 512, 192, 446, 66] with cost equal to -316.48.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 32 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 313, 59] with cost equal to -366.48.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 33 : [512, 256, 512, 320, 22, 449] with cost equal to -705.89.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 34 : [512, 256, 512, 304, 8, 271] with cost equal to -901.76.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 35 : [512, 256, 512, 480, 114, 405] with cost equal to -256.49.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 36 : [512, 256, 256, 96, 87, 58] with cost equal to -478.07.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 37 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 268, 214] with cost equal to -439.96.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 38 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 81, 60] with cost equal to -371.54.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 39 : [512, 512, 256, 304, 112, 172] with cost equal to -430.59.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 40 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 250, 133] with cost equal to -356.29.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 41 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 37, 102] with cost equal to -734.62.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 42 : [512, 512, 512, 64, 340, 349] with cost equal to -339.64.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 43 : [512, 512, 512, 80, 437, 311] with cost equal to -319.25.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 44 : [256, 512, 256, 144, 382, 241] with cost equal to -170.39.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 45 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 42, 42] with cost equal to -600.42.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 46 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 46, 227] with cost equal to -825.68.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 47 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 134, 165] with cost equal to -260.61.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 48 : [256, 256, 512, 32, 162, 133] with cost equal to -413.07.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 49 : [512, 512, 256, 80, 406, 188] with cost equal to -310.98.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 50 : [512, 512, 256, 224, 488, 113] with cost equal to -306.04.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 51 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 173, 56] with cost equal to -392.09.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 52 : [256, 256, 256, 16, 73, 12] with cost equal to -420.41.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 53 : [256, 512, 512, 64, 328, 180] with cost equal to -349.64.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 54 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 84, 24] with cost equal to -454.51.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 55 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 156, 140] with cost equal to -237.24.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 56 : [512, 512, 512, 512, 111, 183] with cost equal to -445.17.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 57 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 104, 394] with cost equal to -547.92.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 58 : [256, 512, 256, 112, 21, 64] with cost equal to -750.94.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 59 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 225, 237] with cost equal to -121.99.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 60 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 342, 115] with cost equal to -364.38.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 61 : [512, 256, 256, 192, 30, 101] with cost equal to -606.58.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 62 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 253, 67] with cost equal to -349.24.
Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 63 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 297, 239] with cost equal to -212.26.
At iteration 2 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.00824117660522461 s.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 165, 325] with cost equal to -370.4.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 256, 236] with cost equal to -296.76.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 2 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 217, 171] with cost equal to -338.74.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 3 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 151, 439] with cost equal to -404.72.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 4 : [256, 512, 512, 240, 305, 293] with cost equal to -256.23.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 5 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 196, 96] with cost equal to -380.95.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 6 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 150, 197] with cost equal to -235.08.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 7 : [512, 512, 512, 64, 167, 454] with cost equal to -442.42.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 8 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 468, 362] with cost equal to -208.84.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 9 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 249, 265] with cost equal to -398.32.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 10 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 123, 122] with cost equal to -338.4.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 11 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 195, 101] with cost equal to -386.11.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 12 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 24, 36] with cost equal to -702.07.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 13 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 69, 158] with cost equal to -546.49.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 14 : [512, 512, 512, 192, 174, 331] with cost equal to -351.36.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 15 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 256, 172] with cost equal to -166.95.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 16 : [256, 256, 512, 176, 2, 253] with cost equal to -610.59.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 17 : [512, 256, 512, 208, 100, 327] with cost equal to -385.6.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 18 : [256, 256, 512, 160, 138, 493] with cost equal to -211.46.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 19 : [256, 512, 256, 160, 460, 54] with cost equal to -295.69.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 20 : [256, 512, 256, 96, 252, 150] with cost equal to -294.07.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 21 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 10, 21] with cost equal to -828.94.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 22 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 134, 75] with cost equal to -354.54.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 23 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 46, 102] with cost equal to -668.48.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 24 : [256, 256, 512, 48, 190, 185] with cost equal to -369.37.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 25 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 90, 96] with cost equal to -310.81.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 26 : [256, 512, 512, 240, 334, 83] with cost equal to -449.8.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 27 : [256, 256, 256, 240, 26, 95] with cost equal to -639.8.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 28 : [256, 512, 512, 176, 128, 332] with cost equal to -403.36.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 29 : [512, 256, 512, 64, 76, 82] with cost equal to -511.45.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 30 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 181, 101] with cost equal to -387.57.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 31 : [512, 512, 256, 128, 348, 162] with cost equal to -297.6.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 32 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 88, 150] with cost equal to -342.69.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 33 : [512, 256, 512, 288, 106, 486] with cost equal to -322.79.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 34 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 238, 2] with cost equal to -293.47.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 35 : [256, 512, 512, 240, 294, 84] with cost equal to -431.36.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 36 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 409, 26] with cost equal to -435.58.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 37 : [256, 512, 256, 16, 180, 82] with cost equal to -392.57.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 38 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 380, 172] with cost equal to -324.89.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 39 : [512, 256, 512, 112, 9, 354] with cost equal to -724.01.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 40 : [256, 512, 256, 144, 3, 201] with cost equal to -737.17.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 41 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 83, 247] with cost equal to -353.6.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 42 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 64, 166] with cost equal to -546.24.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 43 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 247, 136] with cost equal to -320.34.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 44 : [512, 512, 512, 80, 123, 152] with cost equal to -484.61.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 45 : [512, 256, 512, 144, 52, 318] with cost equal to -572.58.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 46 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 26, 238] with cost equal to -702.72.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 47 : [256, 512, 256, 144, 46, 240] with cost equal to -595.2.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 48 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 40, 230] with cost equal to -731.34.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 49 : [512, 256, 256, 208, 223, 235] with cost equal to -189.55.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 50 : [512, 256, 512, 112, 135, 22] with cost equal to -478.01.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 51 : [256, 512, 512, 80, 413, 313] with cost equal to -321.39.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 52 : [512, 256, 512, 160, 76, 79] with cost equal to -540.25.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 53 : [512, 256, 512, 240, 153, 23] with cost equal to -434.75.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 54 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 183, 138] with cost equal to -326.71.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 55 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 123, 241] with cost equal to -165.52.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 56 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 80, 255] with cost equal to -393.37.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 57 : [256, 256, 256, 128, 44, 192] with cost equal to -435.3.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 58 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 180, 211] with cost equal to -247.08.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 59 : [512, 512, 512, 32, 57, 453] with cost equal to -454.66.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 60 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 65, 227] with cost equal to -283.51.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 61 : [512, 256, 512, 32, 214, 307] with cost equal to -355.53.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 62 : [256, 512, 256, 96, 427, 147] with cost equal to -271.69.
Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 63 : [512, 256, 512, 224, 94, 370] with cost equal to -393.18.
At iteration 3 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.007983207702636719 s.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 192, 118, 55] with cost equal to -334.85.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 64, 80, 358] with cost equal to -537.31.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 2 : [256, 256, 512, 208, 144, 265] with cost equal to -309.54.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 3 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 510, 415] with cost equal to -187.8.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 4 : [512, 256, 256, 304, 145, 255] with cost equal to -201.27.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 217, 220] with cost equal to -128.21.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 6 : [512, 256, 256, 16, 53, 185] with cost equal to -356.51.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 7 : [256, 512, 512, 192, 2, 35] with cost equal to -949.79.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 8 : [512, 256, 256, 336, 220, 245] with cost equal to -142.51.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 9 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 240, 30] with cost equal to -367.13.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 10 : [512, 256, 512, 144, 235, 368] with cost equal to -318.14.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 11 : [256, 512, 256, 32, 459, 118] with cost equal to -364.24.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 12 : [512, 512, 512, 16, 109, 344] with cost equal to -359.42.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 13 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 173, 168] with cost equal to -315.64.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 14 : [512, 512, 256, 32, 388, 255] with cost equal to -319.22.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 15 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 213, 67] with cost equal to -326.72.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 16 : [512, 256, 256, 144, 27, 200] with cost equal to -565.03.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 17 : [256, 512, 256, 176, 2, 134] with cost equal to -708.1.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 18 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 218, 129] with cost equal to -254.24.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 19 : [256, 256, 512, 32, 162, 507] with cost equal to -345.32.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 20 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 81, 385] with cost equal to -502.89.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 21 : [512, 512, 256, 128, 451, 59] with cost equal to -328.12.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 22 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 414, 419] with cost equal to -383.64.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 23 : [512, 512, 512, 112, 394, 241] with cost equal to -336.1.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 24 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 63, 255] with cost equal to -282.99.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 25 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 10, 116] with cost equal to -690.96.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 26 : [512, 512, 256, 128, 261, 202] with cost equal to -319.34.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 27 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 73, 33] with cost equal to -440.24.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 28 : [512, 256, 256, 32, 186, 176] with cost equal to -333.08.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 29 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 14, 151] with cost equal to -562.52.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 30 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 112, 101] with cost equal to -426.3.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 31 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 104, 204] with cost equal to -354.4.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 32 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 181, 11] with cost equal to -447.19.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 33 : [512, 512, 256, 224, 457, 256] with cost equal to -193.68.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 34 : [256, 512, 256, 256, 51, 161] with cost equal to -664.32.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 35 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 485, 82] with cost equal to -247.24.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 36 : [512, 512, 256, 384, 36, 147] with cost equal to -693.86.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 37 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 245, 340] with cost equal to -315.25.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 38 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 478, 305] with cost equal to -323.5.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 39 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 440, 136] with cost equal to -204.91.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 40 : [512, 256, 512, 304, 129, 204] with cost equal to -360.65.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 41 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 210, 137] with cost equal to -177.92.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 42 : [256, 512, 512, 208, 169, 387] with cost equal to -327.09.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 43 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 438, 7] with cost equal to -356.21.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 44 : [256, 512, 512, 240, 212, 103] with cost equal to -413.33.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 45 : [512, 256, 512, 32, 59, 286] with cost equal to -431.16.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 46 : [256, 512, 512, 240, 423, 489] with cost equal to -131.64.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 47 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 190, 166] with cost equal to -148.65.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 48 : [512, 256, 512, 240, 230, 140] with cost equal to -362.8.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 49 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 118, 113] with cost equal to -515.19.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 50 : [512, 256, 512, 48, 236, 73] with cost equal to -320.86.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 51 : [512, 256, 256, 240, 256, 83] with cost equal to -302.2.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 52 : [512, 256, 512, 448, 49, 381] with cost equal to -525.65.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 53 : [512, 256, 256, 192, 135, 143] with cost equal to -300.34.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 54 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 127, 141] with cost equal to -358.55.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 55 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 336, 255] with cost equal to -272.38.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 56 : [256, 512, 256, 112, 79, 21] with cost equal to -597.7.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 57 : [512, 256, 512, 144, 223, 511] with cost equal to -285.94.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 58 : [256, 512, 256, 96, 78, 112] with cost equal to -499.55.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 59 : [256, 512, 256, 112, 450, 239] with cost equal to -176.9.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 60 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 51, 111] with cost equal to -538.39.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 61 : [512, 256, 512, 256, 91, 161] with cost equal to -464.06.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 62 : [512, 512, 256, 96, 493, 175] with cost equal to -278.72.
Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 63 : [512, 512, 512, 32, 313, 466] with cost equal to -339.34.
At iteration 4 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.006699800491333008 s.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 117, 23] with cost equal to -458.81.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 77, 47] with cost equal to -567.18.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 2 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 151, 4] with cost equal to -373.43.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 3 : [512, 256, 512, 32, 8, 5] with cost equal to -535.28.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 4 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 89, 291] with cost equal to -365.98.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 5 : [512, 512, 512, 192, 371, 460] with cost equal to -262.46.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 6 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 110, 26] with cost equal to -471.21.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 7 : [256, 512, 512, 64, 416, 427] with cost equal to -295.9.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 8 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 157, 18] with cost equal to -438.89.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 9 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 208, 139] with cost equal to -389.41.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 10 : [512, 512, 256, 96, 184, 158] with cost equal to -376.36.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 11 : [256, 256, 512, 176, 188, 216] with cost equal to -270.14.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 12 : [512, 512, 256, 80, 148, 49] with cost equal to -458.49.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 13 : [512, 512, 512, 192, 132, 283] with cost equal to -326.83.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 14 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 63, 72] with cost equal to -498.22.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 15 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 114, 22] with cost equal to -461.54.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 16 : [512, 256, 512, 32, 151, 397] with cost equal to -369.28.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 17 : [512, 512, 256, 80, 364, 60] with cost equal to -297.76.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 18 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 186, 30] with cost equal to -272.86.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 19 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 100, 195] with cost equal to -381.82.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 20 : [512, 512, 256, 96, 266, 179] with cost equal to -290.34.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 21 : [256, 512, 512, 16, 129, 79] with cost equal to -418.86.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 22 : [512, 256, 512, 32, 160, 154] with cost equal to -394.38.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 23 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 80, 55] with cost equal to -544.34.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 24 : [512, 256, 512, 176, 47, 359] with cost equal to -591.13.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 25 : [256, 512, 256, 240, 258, 158] with cost equal to -234.63.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 26 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 26, 104] with cost equal to -725.68.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 27 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 477, 66] with cost equal to -292.3.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 28 : [256, 512, 512, 208, 347, 441] with cost equal to -188.14.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 29 : [512, 512, 256, 256, 395, 226] with cost equal to -199.47.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 30 : [256, 512, 256, 144, 190, 78] with cost equal to -361.55.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 31 : [512, 512, 256, 80, 181, 171] with cost equal to -392.55.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 32 : [256, 512, 512, 96, 282, 490] with cost equal to -314.48.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 33 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 218, 135] with cost equal to -283.58.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 34 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 177, 247] with cost equal to -121.16.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 35 : [256, 512, 256, 32, 110, 44] with cost equal to -479.16.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 36 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 91, 134] with cost equal to -604.95.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 37 : [512, 256, 256, 320, 36, 229] with cost equal to -485.96.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 38 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 83, 12] with cost equal to -739.77.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 39 : [512, 256, 256, 32, 240, 240] with cost equal to -324.87.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 40 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 307, 242] with cost equal to -310.24.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 41 : [512, 512, 512, 64, 465, 230] with cost equal to -345.27.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 42 : [512, 256, 256, 64, 141, 196] with cost equal to -335.97.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 43 : [512, 256, 512, 448, 73, 23] with cost equal to -635.68.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 44 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 165, 51] with cost equal to -368.64.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 45 : [512, 256, 256, 144, 76, 229] with cost equal to -467.23.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 46 : [512, 512, 256, 160, 173, 8] with cost equal to -394.8.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 47 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 402, 44] with cost equal to -373.92.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 48 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 237, 116] with cost equal to -305.16.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 49 : [512, 512, 512, 512, 364, 374] with cost equal to -171.13.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 50 : [512, 256, 256, 208, 213, 188] with cost equal to -211.34.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 51 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 206, 124] with cost equal to -336.96.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 52 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 199, 75] with cost equal to -342.44.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 53 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 102, 186] with cost equal to -419.41.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 54 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 165, 95] with cost equal to -388.68.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 55 : [256, 512, 512, 80, 359, 141] with cost equal to -337.24.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 56 : [256, 256, 512, 240, 82, 87] with cost equal to -520.17.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 57 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 248, 46] with cost equal to -283.97.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 58 : [512, 256, 512, 144, 3, 121] with cost equal to -646.81.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 59 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 431, 401] with cost equal to -373.99.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 60 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 415, 191] with cost equal to -192.33.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 61 : [512, 256, 512, 224, 206, 132] with cost equal to -384.54.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 62 : [512, 512, 256, 48, 100, 20] with cost equal to -467.94.
Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 63 : [512, 256, 512, 112, 155, 433] with cost equal to -382.56.
At iteration 5 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.015251636505126953 s.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 64, 374, 101] with cost equal to -333.11.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 276, 234] with cost equal to -181.95.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 2 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 190, 156] with cost equal to -353.83.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 3 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 253, 202] with cost equal to -323.93.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 4 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 90, 41] with cost equal to -636.51.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 5 : [512, 256, 512, 160, 180, 268] with cost equal to -366.09.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 6 : [512, 512, 256, 96, 473, 137] with cost equal to -284.56.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 7 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 406, 251] with cost equal to -340.19.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 8 : [256, 256, 512, 32, 186, 85] with cost equal to -446.69.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 9 : [256, 256, 256, 96, 168, 167] with cost equal to -207.05.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 10 : [256, 256, 512, 32, 256, 222] with cost equal to -402.7.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 11 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 287, 76] with cost equal to -312.5.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 12 : [512, 256, 256, 64, 227, 195] with cost equal to -317.38.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 13 : [512, 512, 256, 96, 150, 147] with cost equal to -363.07.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 14 : [512, 256, 512, 64, 21, 346] with cost equal to -563.24.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 15 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 77, 113] with cost equal to -447.12.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 16 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 145, 253] with cost equal to -134.57.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 17 : [512, 256, 256, 96, 116, 151] with cost equal to -355.9.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 18 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 299, 306] with cost equal to -293.33.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 19 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 334, 22] with cost equal to -446.49.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 20 : [512, 256, 256, 128, 226, 159] with cost equal to -332.04.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 21 : [512, 256, 256, 480, 173, 135] with cost equal to -231.93.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 22 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 166, 189] with cost equal to -294.03.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 23 : [512, 256, 512, 112, 80, 214] with cost equal to -537.73.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 24 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 145, 133] with cost equal to -477.5.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 25 : [512, 256, 256, 400, 71, 164] with cost equal to -348.79.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 26 : [256, 256, 512, 16, 55, 174] with cost equal to -432.69.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 27 : [256, 256, 512, 32, 71, 229] with cost equal to -487.24.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 28 : [256, 512, 256, 144, 76, 205] with cost equal to -386.04.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 29 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 255, 232] with cost equal to -170.3.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 30 : [256, 512, 256, 96, 483, 2] with cost equal to -303.76.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 31 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 60, 264] with cost equal to -557.35.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 32 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 108, 211] with cost equal to -404.52.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 33 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 367, 345] with cost equal to -243.9.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 34 : [256, 512, 512, 176, 69, 50] with cost equal to -661.34.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 35 : [512, 512, 256, 208, 511, 255] with cost equal to -186.15.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 36 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 110, 15] with cost equal to -391.09.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 37 : [256, 256, 512, 16, 97, 162] with cost equal to -420.05.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 38 : [256, 512, 512, 240, 362, 113] with cost equal to -427.89.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 39 : [256, 512, 512, 160, 91, 502] with cost equal to -434.4.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 40 : [256, 512, 512, 16, 394, 268] with cost equal to -354.03.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 41 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 439, 505] with cost equal to -404.67.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 42 : [512, 256, 256, 208, 128, 126] with cost equal to -330.41.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 43 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 220, 256] with cost equal to -311.4.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 44 : [256, 512, 512, 80, 253, 210] with cost equal to -375.26.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 45 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 195, 47] with cost equal to -436.95.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 46 : [256, 512, 256, 112, 211, 132] with cost equal to -343.81.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 47 : [512, 256, 512, 240, 8, 469] with cost equal to -846.5.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 48 : [512, 512, 512, 368, 82, 334] with cost equal to -488.55.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 49 : [512, 512, 256, 336, 119, 27] with cost equal to -482.42.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 50 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 104, 212] with cost equal to -391.16.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 51 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 148, 74] with cost equal to -451.2.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 52 : [512, 512, 512, 160, 423, 8] with cost equal to -333.7.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 53 : [512, 256, 512, 112, 65, 227] with cost equal to -564.27.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 54 : [256, 512, 256, 112, 48, 85] with cost equal to -608.94.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 55 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 402, 473] with cost equal to -209.07.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 56 : [512, 512, 512, 144, 128, 119] with cost equal to -469.5.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 57 : [512, 256, 256, 64, 119, 5] with cost equal to -375.03.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 58 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 378, 38] with cost equal to -317.56.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 59 : [512, 256, 512, 208, 198, 43] with cost equal to -377.19.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 60 : [256, 512, 256, 176, 314, 208] with cost equal to -186.71.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 61 : [512, 512, 512, 240, 379, 34] with cost equal to -346.8.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 62 : [512, 256, 256, 96, 38, 35] with cost equal to -579.05.
Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 63 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 144, 230] with cost equal to -514.37.
At iteration 6 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.007268190383911133 s.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 106, 116] with cost equal to -302.98.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 236, 15] with cost equal to -371.25.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 2 : [512, 256, 512, 16, 220, 196] with cost equal to -329.09.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 3 : [512, 512, 512, 176, 179, 164] with cost equal to -396.31.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 4 : [512, 512, 512, 304, 215, 126] with cost equal to -360.35.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 5 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 79, 250] with cost equal to -379.89.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 6 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 5, 116] with cost equal to -748.19.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 64, 88, 98] with cost equal to -382.62.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 8 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 96, 111] with cost equal to -398.24.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 9 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 435, 15] with cost equal to -392.81.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 10 : [256, 256, 512, 192, 124, 193] with cost equal to -293.94.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 11 : [512, 256, 512, 144, 17, 489] with cost equal to -712.01.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 12 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 84, 103] with cost equal to -342.03.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 13 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 184, 85] with cost equal to -388.42.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 14 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 127, 104] with cost equal to -419.05.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 15 : [512, 256, 512, 64, 119, 487] with cost equal to -437.32.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 16 : [512, 256, 256, 112, 233, 22] with cost equal to -353.54.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 17 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 39, 196] with cost equal to -676.32.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 18 : [512, 512, 256, 48, 268, 40] with cost equal to -369.63.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 19 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 41, 162] with cost equal to -543.06.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 20 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 9, 130] with cost equal to -715.0.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 21 : [256, 512, 256, 32, 130, 137] with cost equal to -394.69.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 22 : [256, 512, 512, 256, 149, 464] with cost equal to -330.32.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 23 : [256, 512, 512, 16, 132, 221] with cost equal to -409.41.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 24 : [512, 512, 256, 32, 281, 151] with cost equal to -290.33.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 25 : [256, 512, 256, 16, 427, 135] with cost equal to -333.49.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 26 : [256, 256, 512, 32, 140, 334] with cost equal to -395.88.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 27 : [512, 256, 512, 240, 8, 104] with cost equal to -858.91.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 28 : [512, 512, 256, 112, 146, 10] with cost equal to -418.41.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 29 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 150, 129] with cost equal to -347.9.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 30 : [256, 512, 512, 160, 297, 459] with cost equal to -226.1.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 31 : [512, 256, 256, 144, 135, 31] with cost equal to -355.9.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 32 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 250, 46] with cost equal to -375.07.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 33 : [512, 512, 256, 64, 38, 201] with cost equal to -533.67.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 34 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 512, 203] with cost equal to -128.23.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 35 : [256, 256, 512, 240, 133, 411] with cost equal to -199.34.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 36 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 134, 50] with cost equal to -343.33.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 37 : [512, 512, 256, 16, 289, 5] with cost equal to -275.58.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 38 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 144, 124] with cost equal to -361.04.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 39 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 96, 123] with cost equal to -386.19.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 40 : [512, 512, 512, 112, 18, 98] with cost equal to -690.86.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 41 : [256, 512, 256, 144, 316, 22] with cost equal to -393.3.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 42 : [512, 512, 512, 32, 469, 284] with cost equal to -289.05.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 43 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 103, 129] with cost equal to -320.96.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 44 : [512, 256, 256, 112, 20, 163] with cost equal to -611.92.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 45 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 183, 243] with cost equal to -271.49.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 46 : [256, 256, 512, 208, 63, 234] with cost equal to -632.89.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 47 : [512, 256, 512, 240, 135, 83] with cost equal to -452.19.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 48 : [512, 256, 256, 112, 117, 6] with cost equal to -406.8.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 49 : [512, 512, 256, 48, 59, 116] with cost equal to -491.3.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 50 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 112, 57] with cost equal to -441.59.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 51 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 144, 308] with cost equal to -382.09.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 52 : [256, 256, 512, 48, 31, 304] with cost equal to -594.54.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 53 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 369, 58] with cost equal to -343.79.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 54 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 505, 108] with cost equal to -323.36.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 55 : [512, 256, 512, 224, 21, 506] with cost equal to -676.95.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 56 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 169, 144] with cost equal to -304.92.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 57 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 10, 242] with cost equal to -440.6.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 58 : [256, 512, 256, 96, 267, 188] with cost equal to -259.7.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 59 : [512, 512, 256, 80, 119, 88] with cost equal to -448.09.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 60 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 166, 341] with cost equal to -203.86.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 61 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 226, 247] with cost equal to -253.6.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 62 : [512, 256, 512, 112, 177, 273] with cost equal to -390.03.
Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 63 : [512, 512, 512, 176, 188, 29] with cost equal to -393.2.
At iteration 7 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.007859230041503906 s.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 229, 162] with cost equal to -377.81.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 153, 251] with cost equal to -344.59.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 2 : [512, 512, 512, 16, 395, 141] with cost equal to -293.92.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 3 : [512, 256, 512, 16, 7, 422] with cost equal to -432.49.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 4 : [256, 256, 512, 240, 85, 238] with cost equal to -502.38.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 5 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 147, 93] with cost equal to -449.78.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 6 : [512, 256, 512, 240, 88, 162] with cost equal to -537.8.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 7 : [256, 256, 256, 240, 135, 88] with cost equal to -239.05.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 8 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 196, 167] with cost equal to -292.14.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 9 : [512, 512, 512, 112, 328, 364] with cost equal to -327.75.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 10 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 42, 173] with cost equal to -469.61.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 11 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 237, 96] with cost equal to -397.12.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 12 : [256, 256, 512, 208, 75, 287] with cost equal to -417.92.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 13 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 369, 165] with cost equal to -197.08.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 14 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 57, 450] with cost equal to -483.23.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 15 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 5, 37] with cost equal to -766.45.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 16 : [256, 256, 512, 32, 42, 298] with cost equal to -515.85.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 17 : [512, 512, 256, 80, 24, 230] with cost equal to -599.73.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 18 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 118, 142] with cost equal to -371.44.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 19 : [512, 512, 256, 176, 185, 198] with cost equal to -355.21.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 20 : [256, 256, 512, 144, 27, 396] with cost equal to -652.87.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 21 : [512, 256, 512, 304, 141, 296] with cost equal to -314.71.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 22 : [256, 256, 512, 208, 24, 370] with cost equal to -659.83.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 23 : [512, 512, 256, 224, 341, 24] with cost equal to -370.37.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 24 : [512, 256, 512, 368, 113, 444] with cost equal to -279.68.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 25 : [512, 256, 512, 240, 180, 292] with cost equal to -321.35.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 26 : [512, 256, 256, 304, 89, 153] with cost equal to -323.29.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 27 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 62, 95] with cost equal to -518.73.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 28 : [512, 256, 512, 208, 71, 205] with cost equal to -546.74.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 29 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 104, 45] with cost equal to -518.24.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 30 : [256, 256, 512, 192, 209, 282] with cost equal to -225.44.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 31 : [512, 512, 256, 64, 83, 91] with cost equal to -494.1.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 32 : [256, 512, 512, 176, 6, 386] with cost equal to -859.04.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 33 : [256, 512, 512, 160, 452, 450] with cost equal to -171.96.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 34 : [256, 256, 512, 32, 132, 6] with cost equal to -454.56.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 35 : [512, 256, 512, 304, 215, 194] with cost equal to -309.89.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 36 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 209, 139] with cost equal to -298.85.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 37 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 186, 76] with cost equal to -367.57.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 38 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 291, 2] with cost equal to -444.97.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 39 : [512, 256, 512, 16, 55, 486] with cost equal to -359.04.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 40 : [512, 512, 512, 320, 507, 329] with cost equal to -197.12.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 41 : [256, 512, 512, 64, 302, 12] with cost equal to -390.25.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 42 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 224, 65] with cost equal to -343.9.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 43 : [256, 256, 512, 176, 53, 39] with cost equal to -716.22.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 44 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 450, 13] with cost equal to -347.34.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 45 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 72, 128] with cost equal to -594.77.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 46 : [256, 512, 256, 96, 424, 234] with cost equal to -206.26.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 47 : [512, 256, 256, 112, 219, 96] with cost equal to -366.78.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 48 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 39, 211] with cost equal to -447.76.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 49 : [256, 512, 512, 208, 255, 98] with cost equal to -446.43.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 50 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 183, 52] with cost equal to -408.17.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 51 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 355, 10] with cost equal to -393.64.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 52 : [256, 512, 256, 176, 466, 155] with cost equal to -181.0.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 53 : [512, 512, 256, 144, 64, 148] with cost equal to -576.8.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 54 : [512, 256, 256, 96, 18, 117] with cost equal to -632.59.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 55 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 60, 163] with cost equal to -617.0.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 56 : [512, 256, 512, 32, 90, 26] with cost equal to -440.87.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 57 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 255, 251] with cost equal to -409.27.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 58 : [256, 512, 512, 240, 100, 387] with cost equal to -525.45.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 59 : [512, 256, 512, 32, 167, 447] with cost equal to -355.18.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 60 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 124, 114] with cost equal to -414.19.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 61 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 98, 495] with cost equal to -518.92.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 62 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 155, 110] with cost equal to -365.85.
Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 63 : [256, 512, 512, 16, 66, 272] with cost equal to -429.1.
At iteration 8 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.006657600402832031 s.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 512, 288, 49, 266] with cost equal to -591.44.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 256, 112, 297, 103] with cost equal to -312.27.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 2 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 405, 208] with cost equal to -383.09.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 3 : [256, 512, 512, 64, 76, 140] with cost equal to -533.25.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 4 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 24, 152] with cost equal to -594.0.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 5 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 96, 205] with cost equal to -404.36.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 6 : [512, 256, 256, 112, 249, 224] with cost equal to -299.39.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 7 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 119, 247] with cost equal to -593.93.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 8 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 53, 132] with cost equal to -523.87.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 9 : [512, 512, 512, 176, 494, 286] with cost equal to -287.8.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 10 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 90, 16] with cost equal to -528.13.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 11 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 256, 151] with cost equal to -270.72.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 12 : [512, 256, 512, 16, 192, 174] with cost equal to -334.15.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 13 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 103, 28] with cost equal to -508.45.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 14 : [512, 512, 256, 96, 50, 56] with cost equal to -587.39.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 15 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 320, 81] with cost equal to -346.65.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 16 : [512, 256, 512, 192, 228, 157] with cost equal to -339.54.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 17 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 468, 118] with cost equal to -352.88.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 18 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 222, 102] with cost equal to -372.97.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 19 : [512, 256, 256, 256, 120, 133] with cost equal to -364.09.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 20 : [512, 256, 256, 208, 182, 54] with cost equal to -352.18.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 21 : [256, 256, 512, 192, 190, 65] with cost equal to -361.02.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 22 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 106, 475] with cost equal to -528.49.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 23 : [512, 256, 256, 208, 159, 99] with cost equal to -303.48.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 24 : [512, 256, 512, 304, 215, 400] with cost equal to -205.68.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 25 : [512, 256, 512, 32, 134, 103] with cost equal to -405.86.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 26 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 233, 103] with cost equal to -322.56.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 27 : [512, 512, 256, 80, 264, 220] with cost equal to -341.07.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 28 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 150, 169] with cost equal to -248.86.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 29 : [512, 512, 256, 112, 473, 158] with cost equal to -288.51.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 30 : [256, 512, 512, 192, 43, 227] with cost equal to -800.72.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 31 : [256, 512, 512, 64, 268, 436] with cost equal to -372.46.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 32 : [256, 512, 256, 176, 208, 3] with cost equal to -385.95.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 33 : [256, 256, 512, 32, 186, 198] with cost equal to -389.0.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 34 : [512, 512, 512, 32, 214, 68] with cost equal to -324.59.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 35 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 204, 207] with cost equal to -224.82.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 36 : [256, 256, 512, 16, 92, 353] with cost equal to -391.76.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 37 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 127, 319] with cost equal to -346.44.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 38 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 148, 143] with cost equal to -200.7.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 39 : [512, 512, 512, 304, 444, 494] with cost equal to -157.99.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 40 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 100, 137] with cost equal to -509.61.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 41 : [256, 512, 256, 192, 234, 60] with cost equal to -365.1.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 42 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 70, 64] with cost equal to -457.07.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 43 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 328, 173] with cost equal to -193.76.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 44 : [256, 512, 256, 144, 430, 144] with cost equal to -229.81.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 45 : [512, 256, 512, 240, 133, 16] with cost equal to -448.68.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 46 : [512, 512, 512, 144, 77, 282] with cost equal to -582.33.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 47 : [512, 256, 256, 80, 224, 46] with cost equal to -348.56.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 48 : [512, 256, 256, 96, 102, 23] with cost equal to -495.13.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 49 : [512, 256, 512, 16, 48, 65] with cost equal to -349.41.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 50 : [256, 256, 512, 240, 134, 95] with cost equal to -376.48.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 51 : [256, 256, 256, 96, 191, 60] with cost equal to -334.28.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 52 : [512, 512, 512, 32, 186, 30] with cost equal to -414.02.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 53 : [256, 512, 256, 48, 398, 52] with cost equal to -309.68.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 54 : [512, 256, 512, 304, 22, 137] with cost equal to -785.96.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 55 : [256, 512, 256, 128, 148, 88] with cost equal to -489.0.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 56 : [512, 256, 256, 224, 5, 217] with cost equal to -734.15.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 57 : [512, 512, 256, 32, 315, 206] with cost equal to -327.24.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 58 : [256, 256, 256, 32, 151, 223] with cost equal to -302.51.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 59 : [256, 512, 512, 16, 206, 41] with cost equal to -416.8.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 60 : [256, 256, 256, 224, 241, 55] with cost equal to -283.03.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 61 : [512, 256, 256, 176, 101, 72] with cost equal to -528.15.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 62 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 22, 50] with cost equal to -619.92.
Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 63 : [512, 256, 512, 512, 66, 267] with cost equal to -599.95.
At iteration 9 on process 0 the update of tau takes 0.006526470184326172 s.
Le temps d'exécution total est 8424.060680627823 s.
Le chemin optimal est [256, 512, 512, 192, 2, 35].
Le throughput associé est alors 949.79 MPoints/s.
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment