diff --git a/results/maxmin_16np_32_ants_300iter/result_16np_32ants_300_iter_4.out b/results/maxmin_16np_32_ants_300iter/result_16np_32ants_300_iter_4.out
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a1791b07bc7348cc531299a5ae1f8e441cfdb951
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/maxmin_16np_32_ants_300iter/result_16np_32ants_300_iter_4.out
@@ -0,0 +1,9624 @@
+ls: impossible d'accéder à 'src': Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type
+icpc: remark #10397: optimization reports are generated in *.optrpt files in the output location
+icpc: remark #10397: optimization reports are generated in *.optrpt files in the output location
+Process 0 launched on node kyle09.
+Compiling with OPTIMIZATION: -O3 and simd: avx512
+Compiling successful
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 512, 112, 99, 28] with cost equal to -492.6.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 496, 462, 289] with cost equal to -157.79.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 48, 43, 208] with cost equal to -533.1.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 240, 80, 434] with cost equal to -277.72.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 203, 237] with cost equal to -299.75.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 128, 195] with cost equal to -283.43.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 80, 289, 487] with cost equal to -346.34.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 504, 323] with cost equal to -205.21.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 80, 93, 381] with cost equal to -510.74.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 256, 352, 255, 157] with cost equal to -248.48.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 512, 195, 332] with cost equal to -299.24.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 31, 329] with cost equal to -539.26.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 483, 265] with cost equal to -278.32.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 48, 427, 18] with cost equal to -321.52.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 75, 327] with cost equal to -337.37.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 48, 173, 421] with cost equal to -431.58.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 96, 31, 94] with cost equal to -626.03.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 4, 379] with cost equal to -592.4.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 171, 456] with cost equal to -280.78.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 51, 380] with cost equal to -564.19.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 0 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 23, 22] with cost equal to -715.07.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 256, 186, 204] with cost equal to -410.68.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 80, 289, 502] with cost equal to -350.33.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 506, 426] with cost equal to -254.06.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 450, 331] with cost equal to -163.52.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 59] with cost equal to -779.64.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 0 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 1] with cost equal to -397.98.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 466, 418] with cost equal to -212.76.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 57, 257] with cost equal to -660.01.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 508] with cost equal to -627.27.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 17, 307] with cost equal to -680.91.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 315, 476] with cost equal to -168.99.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 364, 502] with cost equal to -207.56.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 210, 141] with cost equal to -371.41.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 159, 384] with cost equal to -316.02.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 342] with cost equal to -621.55.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 333, 123] with cost equal to -365.84.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 494, 321] with cost equal to -154.17.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.57.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 512, 57] with cost equal to -329.78.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 438, 17] with cost equal to -405.54.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 31, 505] with cost equal to -603.49.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 118] with cost equal to -771.61.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.09.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.83.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 95, 190] with cost equal to -459.71.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 145, 47] with cost equal to -563.44.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 82, 141] with cost equal to -506.11.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 5] with cost equal to -734.8.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.47.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.56.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 101, 232] with cost equal to -493.88.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 422] with cost equal to -715.16.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.55.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 350] with cost equal to -609.05.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 44, 232] with cost equal to -630.58.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.47.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 102, 48] with cost equal to -614.68.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.37.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 136] with cost equal to -728.88.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.51.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 46] with cost equal to -790.86.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.2.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.48.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 354] with cost equal to -599.35.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 0 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -715.67.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.01.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 98, 87] with cost equal to -593.62.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 159, 78] with cost equal to -478.73.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.6.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.01.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.04.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.51.Process 14 launched on node kyle16.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 14 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 256, 208, 129, 252] with cost equal to -239.03.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 14 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 512, 144, 92, 503] with cost equal to -416.48.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 5] with cost equal to -702.42.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 199, 338] with cost equal to -304.7.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 256, 240, 457, 183] with cost equal to -121.87.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 307, 324] with cost equal to -225.55.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 53, 296] with cost equal to -484.55.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 204, 15] with cost equal to -409.54.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 51, 289] with cost equal to -458.46.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 14 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 176, 367, 228] with cost equal to -314.92.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 72, 269] with cost equal to -635.65.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 14 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 146, 212] with cost equal to -392.94.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 116] with cost equal to -735.29.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 14 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 144, 444, 103] with cost equal to -291.79.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 14 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 416, 302] with cost equal to -299.17.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 48, 23, 244] with cost equal to -575.9.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 302, 372] with cost equal to -395.36.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 14 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 337, 452] with cost equal to -308.44.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 165, 208] with cost equal to -467.44.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 51, 214] with cost equal to -526.72.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 14 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 41, 200] with cost equal to -616.85.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 185, 209] with cost equal to -388.86.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 14 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 401, 426] with cost equal to -233.18.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 14 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 150, 265] with cost equal to -334.24.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 208, 85, 253] with cost equal to -576.8.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 56, 357] with cost equal to -581.61.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 14 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 368, 138, 185] with cost equal to -384.79.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 14 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 51, 346] with cost equal to -566.4.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 224, 96] with cost equal to -373.02.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 160, 352, 398] with cost equal to -207.3.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 440, 101] with cost equal to -355.18.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 14 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 212] with cost equal to -689.62.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 460, 80] with cost equal to -339.59.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 14 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 108] with cost equal to -695.34.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 124, 120] with cost equal to -523.99.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 34] with cost equal to -755.02.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 14 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 512, 224, 45, 109] with cost equal to -582.64.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 458, 445] with cost equal to -179.57.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.94.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 263] with cost equal to -668.33.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 249, 180] with cost equal to -314.69.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 9, 194] with cost equal to -747.79.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 74] with cost equal to -790.5.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 330, 265] with cost equal to -260.18.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 389] with cost equal to -701.7.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 14 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 23, 106] with cost equal to -712.65.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 432, 408] with cost equal to -144.7.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 478] with cost equal to -714.85.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 215, 234] with cost equal to -371.7.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.82.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 222] with cost equal to -752.1.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 93] with cost equal to -749.44.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 67] with cost equal to -700.52.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 444, 432] with cost equal to -134.71.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.21.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.06.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 458, 22] with cost equal to -385.12.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 496, 283] with cost equal to -175.31.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 471, 93] with cost equal to -346.17.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 72, 47] with cost equal to -734.78.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.54.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.89.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.88.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 23, 238] with cost equal to -771.84.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.55.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 371, 40] with cost equal to -424.51.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.31.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.41.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.12.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.22.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 112] with cost equal to -750.02.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 57] with cost equal to -796.16.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.74.Process 12 launched on node kyle15.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 256, 240, 239, 209] with cost equal to -162.93.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 4, 26] with cost equal to -688.58.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 80, 16, 481] with cost equal to -590.16.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 208, 143, 170] with cost equal to -264.56.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 24, 159] with cost equal to -566.44.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 101, 504] with cost equal to -277.03.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 256, 32, 111, 234] with cost equal to -459.25.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 414, 182] with cost equal to -297.67.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 82, 483] with cost equal to -265.65.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 4, 361] with cost equal to -579.49.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 176, 454, 226] with cost equal to -299.5.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 12 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 499, 185] with cost equal to -282.66.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 210, 173] with cost equal to -322.62.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 117, 133] with cost equal to -477.91.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 64, 445, 106] with cost equal to -313.37.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 113, 381] with cost equal to -220.98.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 390, 331] with cost equal to -186.3.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 12 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 480, 471, 499] with cost equal to -106.71.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 185, 318] with cost equal to -324.04.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 208, 371] with cost equal to -148.85.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 480, 359, 213] with cost equal to -252.36.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 279, 209] with cost equal to -322.06.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 28, 117] with cost equal to -654.6.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 12 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 256, 384, 97, 219] with cost equal to -417.34.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 310, 92] with cost equal to -324.51.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 465, 130] with cost equal to -306.79.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 432, 82, 43] with cost equal to -520.74.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 176, 55] with cost equal to -463.53.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 2, 461] with cost equal to -531.59.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 24, 224] with cost equal to -699.69.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 23, 234] with cost equal to -701.28.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 231] with cost equal to -738.31.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 411, 31] with cost equal to -379.98.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 36, 400] with cost equal to -641.67.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 46, 413] with cost equal to -589.84.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 12 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 41, 93] with cost equal to -642.56.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 339, 158] with cost equal to -283.43.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 404, 229] with cost equal to -243.96.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 112] with cost equal to -693.61.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 89, 472] with cost equal to -491.7.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -697.22.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 85, 134] with cost equal to -585.69.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 143] with cost equal to -716.83.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 353] with cost equal to -610.48.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 19, 378] with cost equal to -733.63.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 389] with cost equal to -624.45.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.74.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 390] with cost equal to -695.04.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 107] with cost equal to -739.32.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.86.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 261] with cost equal to -713.07.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 171] with cost equal to -688.17.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 136] with cost equal to -742.8.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 301, 95] with cost equal to -403.94.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 51, 336] with cost equal to -568.48.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 421, 342] with cost equal to -170.23.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 136] with cost equal to -737.85.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.45.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 192] with cost equal to -705.33.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 287] with cost equal to -691.92.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.32.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.49.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.22.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.73.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.85.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -773.72.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.82.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.49.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.16.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.54.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.49.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.75.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.58.Process 10 launched on node kyle14.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 10 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 416, 307, 63] with cost equal to -331.32.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 64, 428, 37] with cost equal to -305.52.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 160, 128, 45] with cost equal to -350.67.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 80, 21, 147] with cost equal to -502.38.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 96, 80, 320] with cost equal to -366.6.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 16, 220, 330] with cost equal to -362.75.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 173, 330] with cost equal to -328.53.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 368, 111, 472] with cost equal to -401.11.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 352, 221] with cost equal to -265.66.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 256, 310, 174] with cost equal to -276.81.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 10 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 64, 331, 444] with cost equal to -345.44.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 16, 344, 26] with cost equal to -299.14.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 10 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 83, 153] with cost equal to -450.31.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 320, 460, 252] with cost equal to -247.01.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 226, 468] with cost equal to -224.08.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 445, 393] with cost equal to -273.92.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 123, 206] with cost equal to -320.34.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 17, 62] with cost equal to -604.02.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 141, 250] with cost equal to -496.78.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 325, 112] with cost equal to -333.43.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 39, 339] with cost equal to -536.78.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 4, 221] with cost equal to -620.78.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 112] with cost equal to -750.79.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 64, 264] with cost equal to -518.07.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 504, 227] with cost equal to -205.82.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 115, 318] with cost equal to -450.6.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 155] with cost equal to -670.73.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 460, 88] with cost equal to -276.14.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 51, 52] with cost equal to -627.83.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 282, 344] with cost equal to -284.1.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 6, 199] with cost equal to -752.46.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 168, 212] with cost equal to -382.33.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 503] with cost equal to -596.34.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 51, 48] with cost equal to -616.12.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 111] with cost equal to -715.32.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 372, 510] with cost equal to -143.27.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 452, 209] with cost equal to -232.12.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 220, 236] with cost equal to -369.49.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 304] with cost equal to -689.97.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 459, 196] with cost equal to -231.68.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 236, 475] with cost equal to -214.14.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 41, 116] with cost equal to -643.3.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 166, 365] with cost equal to -308.19.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 26, 281] with cost equal to -609.29.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 31, 253] with cost equal to -487.16.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 258, 455] with cost equal to -304.8.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 113, 491] with cost equal to -431.19.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 4, 222] with cost equal to -654.56.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.83.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 185, 207] with cost equal to -386.8.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.56.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 112] with cost equal to -781.79.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.4.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 313, 80] with cost equal to -365.24.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.04.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 208, 35, 342] with cost equal to -677.25.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 411] with cost equal to -711.91.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.86.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 67, 24] with cost equal to -740.34.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 10 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -698.15.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.02.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.42.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.14.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 181] with cost equal to -694.05.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 352] with cost equal to -695.29.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.87.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 455, 6] with cost equal to -406.02.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.13.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.84.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 24, 121] with cost equal to -771.31.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.75.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.94.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.1.Process 11 launched on node kyle14.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 512, 464, 183, 74] with cost equal to -383.68.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 256, 189, 426] with cost equal to -257.44.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 168, 508] with cost equal to -199.47.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 210, 55] with cost equal to -464.15.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 512, 80, 220, 273] with cost equal to -360.72.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 17, 491] with cost equal to -661.88.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 48, 77, 20] with cost equal to -529.57.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 185, 158] with cost equal to -269.17.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 96, 140, 488] with cost equal to -414.82.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 262, 251] with cost equal to -311.7.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 87, 7] with cost equal to -474.45.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 104, 19] with cost equal to -463.22.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 408, 436] with cost equal to -226.5.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 53, 340] with cost equal to -515.88.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 208, 364, 8] with cost equal to -319.31.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 256, 241] with cost equal to -343.34.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 176, 100, 234] with cost equal to -486.39.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 501, 107] with cost equal to -261.71.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 113, 247] with cost equal to -353.27.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 44, 396] with cost equal to -583.17.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 477, 454] with cost equal to -206.22.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 247, 386] with cost equal to -307.32.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 431, 443] with cost equal to -136.04.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 356, 138] with cost equal to -302.2.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 23, 183] with cost equal to -668.12.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 90, 110] with cost equal to -497.51.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 106, 69] with cost equal to -557.77.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 72, 454] with cost equal to -495.25.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 257] with cost equal to -688.28.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 404, 350] with cost equal to -234.47.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 480, 369] with cost equal to -144.51.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 403, 321] with cost equal to -185.1.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 248, 260] with cost equal to -336.4.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 171] with cost equal to -665.18.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 312] with cost equal to -703.32.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 71] with cost equal to -795.05.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 418, 511] with cost equal to -128.81.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 478] with cost equal to -613.47.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 114] with cost equal to -709.89.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 72, 185] with cost equal to -510.16.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 150] with cost equal to -682.52.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 74, 341] with cost equal to -519.72.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 393] with cost equal to -703.8.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.63.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 4] with cost equal to -708.99.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 236, 89] with cost equal to -365.5.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 153, 282] with cost equal to -370.63.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 257] with cost equal to -679.24.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 39, 275] with cost equal to -640.8.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 468, 48] with cost equal to -298.3.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.97.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 407, 190] with cost equal to -249.62.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 66, 481] with cost equal to -583.52.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.11.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 11 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -688.98.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 357, 84] with cost equal to -384.43.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 484, 55] with cost equal to -326.34.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.13.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.76.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 23, 213] with cost equal to -741.68.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 69, 251] with cost equal to -647.71.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.56.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.44.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.53.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.37.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 11 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -692.69.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.06.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.1.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 71, 325] with cost equal to -581.86.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.88.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 6] with cost equal to -766.97.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.06.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 460] with cost equal to -708.96.Process 3 launched on node kyle10.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 3 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 272, 211, 1] with cost equal to -304.01.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 48, 246] with cost equal to -565.95.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 256, 176, 283, 115] with cost equal to -275.59.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 256, 51, 480] with cost equal to -423.03.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 247, 477] with cost equal to -205.41.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 48, 467, 118] with cost equal to -272.5.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 32, 348, 345] with cost equal to -380.18.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 3 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 512, 368, 255, 253] with cost equal to -224.91.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 3 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 176, 81, 220] with cost equal to -522.51.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 3 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 140, 162] with cost equal to -416.49.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 197, 465] with cost equal to -321.7.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 3 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 512, 128, 237, 372] with cost equal to -321.2.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 3 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 356, 274] with cost equal to -300.83.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 256, 16, 451, 103] with cost equal to -346.58.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 3 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 24, 431] with cost equal to -695.92.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 118] with cost equal to -727.15.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 176, 150, 309] with cost equal to -226.61.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 459, 427] with cost equal to -186.33.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 170, 19] with cost equal to -505.5.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 395, 210] with cost equal to -247.7.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 94, 177] with cost equal to -555.71.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 406, 132] with cost equal to -309.15.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 419, 191] with cost equal to -246.82.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 169, 193] with cost equal to -403.2.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 3 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 23, 209] with cost equal to -676.64.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 3 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 336, 316, 20] with cost equal to -329.84.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 3 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 455, 232] with cost equal to -293.61.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 223, 72] with cost equal to -412.86.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 3 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 41, 196] with cost equal to -609.51.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 356, 280] with cost equal to -234.64.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 212, 111] with cost equal to -336.26.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 383, 446] with cost equal to -152.23.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 3 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 89, 493] with cost equal to -431.77.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 3 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 106, 113] with cost equal to -485.39.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 89, 316] with cost equal to -550.55.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 156, 39] with cost equal to -509.85.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 168] with cost equal to -672.25.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 221] with cost equal to -747.46.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 327, 371] with cost equal to -196.6.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 504, 146] with cost equal to -258.92.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 305, 365] with cost equal to -211.59.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 237, 293] with cost equal to -293.29.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 287, 135] with cost equal to -317.44.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 408] with cost equal to -709.45.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 299] with cost equal to -706.59.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.45.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 256] with cost equal to -683.95.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 3 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 292, 252] with cost equal to -311.92.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.59.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 502, 130] with cost equal to -294.19.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 404] with cost equal to -582.54.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 93] with cost equal to -769.6.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.48.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 3 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -697.03.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 412, 175] with cost equal to -255.18.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 273, 261] with cost equal to -310.11.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 41] with cost equal to -785.45.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 352, 375] with cost equal to -185.08.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 227] with cost equal to -765.11.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 277, 348] with cost equal to -232.12.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.62.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 398, 106] with cost equal to -379.55.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 404, 414] with cost equal to -152.16.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 357] with cost equal to -690.16.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 147] with cost equal to -702.77.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 377] with cost equal to -708.26.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.55.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 418] with cost equal to -730.05.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 320, 317] with cost equal to -223.64.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.46.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.2.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.01.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 175] with cost equal to -684.18.Process 9 launched on node kyle13.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 9 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 256, 240, 90, 222] with cost equal to -292.91.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 9 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 256, 144, 33, 28] with cost equal to -634.76.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 80, 184, 29] with cost equal to -408.39.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 16, 265, 341] with cost equal to -372.84.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 357, 91] with cost equal to -320.85.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 161, 127] with cost equal to -355.08.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 165, 275] with cost equal to -318.14.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 127, 174] with cost equal to -546.39.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 123, 328] with cost equal to -436.49.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 9 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 350, 65] with cost equal to -287.46.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 9 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 24, 284] with cost equal to -667.45.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 72, 239] with cost equal to -539.75.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 96, 148, 106] with cost equal to -282.61.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 374, 160] with cost equal to -295.46.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 192, 479, 31] with cost equal to -283.53.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 9 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 411, 86] with cost equal to -297.24.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 9 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 71, 292] with cost equal to -547.6.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 304] with cost equal to -658.15.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 99, 55] with cost equal to -614.67.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 9 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 400, 283, 56] with cost equal to -335.1.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 224, 111] with cost equal to -351.03.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 9 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 268, 380] with cost equal to -287.41.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 9 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 14, 145] with cost equal to -730.32.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 9 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 19, 416] with cost equal to -694.92.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 420, 217] with cost equal to -239.32.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 374] with cost equal to -707.45.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 9 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 485, 344] with cost equal to -286.76.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 105, 238] with cost equal to -496.96.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 9 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 72, 181] with cost equal to -504.41.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 35, 403] with cost equal to -658.67.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 405, 439] with cost equal to -203.85.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 236, 86] with cost equal to -371.19.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 30, 246] with cost equal to -743.29.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 136] with cost equal to -728.26.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 9 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 51, 109] with cost equal to -612.29.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 9 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 369] with cost equal to -656.81.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 475] with cost equal to -715.92.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 112, 468] with cost equal to -438.75.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 65, 399] with cost equal to -593.97.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 284, 223] with cost equal to -303.41.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 196] with cost equal to -668.28.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 46, 28] with cost equal to -665.28.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 275] with cost equal to -706.9.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.98.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 275, 475] with cost equal to -189.06.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 329, 247] with cost equal to -288.6.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 258, 389] with cost equal to -226.98.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 272] with cost equal to -677.15.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 265, 424] with cost equal to -208.65.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.94.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 179, 312] with cost equal to -311.07.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 324, 287] with cost equal to -243.34.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 150] with cost equal to -719.3.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 286, 304] with cost equal to -247.48.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.85.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 436, 322] with cost equal to -170.92.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 272, 300] with cost equal to -261.33.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 218, 270] with cost equal to -329.61.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 259, 486] with cost equal to -197.58.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.68.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 80] with cost equal to -805.81.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 23, 258] with cost equal to -772.38.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 118, 506] with cost equal to -367.33.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 433, 389] with cost equal to -151.37.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.13.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 500, 467] with cost equal to -115.56.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.41.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 146, 125] with cost equal to -449.98.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 491, 147] with cost equal to -309.65.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 351, 489] with cost equal to -150.15.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.22.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.2.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 260] with cost equal to -681.9.Process 15 launched on node kyle16.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 15 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 512, 416, 228, 164] with cost equal to -255.57.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 15 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 464, 374, 26] with cost equal to -388.83.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 144, 151, 419] with cost equal to -212.46.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 256, 256, 2, 204] with cost equal to -622.05.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 90, 180] with cost equal to -365.76.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 118, 210] with cost equal to -300.17.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 85, 379] with cost equal to -323.18.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 231, 462] with cost equal to -164.94.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 151, 115] with cost equal to -278.07.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 9, 501] with cost equal to -640.83.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 15 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 447, 337] with cost equal to -240.38.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 15 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 256, 192, 142, 2] with cost equal to -319.13.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 15 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 346, 496] with cost equal to -255.78.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 188, 428] with cost equal to -143.84.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 15 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 195, 337] with cost equal to -332.9.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 15 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 202, 36] with cost equal to -363.08.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 15 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 192, 77] with cost equal to -359.23.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 498, 89] with cost equal to -302.4.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 401, 390] with cost equal to -201.41.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 15 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 211, 308] with cost equal to -332.98.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 15 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 368, 330] with cost equal to -276.02.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 310, 182] with cost equal to -282.88.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 16, 288] with cost equal to -738.61.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 254, 224] with cost equal to -318.56.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 15 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 80, 388, 26] with cost equal to -345.29.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 171] with cost equal to -604.66.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 307, 70] with cost equal to -352.7.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 459, 240] with cost equal to -215.06.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 288, 210] with cost equal to -291.84.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 15 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 464, 431, 375] with cost equal to -149.3.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 15 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 228, 212] with cost equal to -334.86.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 162] with cost equal to -662.32.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 424, 486] with cost equal to -129.7.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 355, 207] with cost equal to -264.95.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 222] with cost equal to -744.94.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 445] with cost equal to -712.41.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 19, 9] with cost equal to -764.2.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 15 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 245, 430] with cost equal to -333.11.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 450] with cost equal to -724.15.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 15 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 429, 57] with cost equal to -301.09.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 20, 337] with cost equal to -615.15.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 395, 175] with cost equal to -257.72.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 393, 447] with cost equal to -145.75.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.1.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 15 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 40] with cost equal to -680.05.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 173, 72] with cost equal to -487.63.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 465, 186] with cost equal to -290.84.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.85.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -728.84.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.23.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 8, 398] with cost equal to -746.28.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 106, 407] with cost equal to -465.04.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 264, 215] with cost equal to -304.17.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.11.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.78.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.37.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 385] with cost equal to -692.83.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.6.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 15 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -686.87.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 413] with cost equal to -699.27.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 112] with cost equal to -753.35.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.08.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.72.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.79.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 136] with cost equal to -734.08.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.28.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 176] with cost equal to -691.83.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.86.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 87, 56] with cost equal to -675.43.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 199] with cost equal to -713.18.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.63.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.49.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 73, 186] with cost equal to -632.72.Process 5 launched on node kyle11.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 112, 247, 100] with cost equal to -232.87.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 192, 314, 192] with cost equal to -269.24.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 189, 185] with cost equal to -366.7.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 256, 224, 156, 29] with cost equal to -544.72.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 97, 418] with cost equal to -237.77.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 96, 182, 473] with cost equal to -380.76.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 368, 163] with cost equal to -306.14.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 80, 432, 509] with cost equal to -252.98.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 5 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 80, 89, 421] with cost equal to -522.59.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 256, 279, 30] with cost equal to -432.69.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 5 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 136] with cost equal to -706.21.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 256, 168, 165] with cost equal to -411.13.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 160, 100, 509] with cost equal to -252.82.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 5 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 76, 400] with cost equal to -527.65.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 5 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 396, 434] with cost equal to -292.61.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 5 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 32, 424, 163] with cost equal to -321.85.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 391, 343] with cost equal to -183.43.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 5 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 96, 199, 64] with cost equal to -337.38.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 17, 475] with cost equal to -609.39.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 5 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 499, 17] with cost equal to -295.08.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 77, 359] with cost equal to -569.15.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 5 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 178, 450] with cost equal to -360.91.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 294, 454] with cost equal to -187.03.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 5 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 39, 471] with cost equal to -646.66.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 97, 469] with cost equal to -477.34.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 111, 273] with cost equal to -377.21.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 449, 435] with cost equal to -134.26.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 5 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 512, 216] with cost equal to -286.74.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 256, 452, 149] with cost equal to -266.16.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 353, 312] with cost equal to -212.84.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 38] with cost equal to -792.29.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 386, 159] with cost equal to -274.67.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 223, 213] with cost equal to -356.06.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 5 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 405, 164] with cost equal to -317.38.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 477, 185] with cost equal to -292.29.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 5 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 275] with cost equal to -684.62.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.22.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 281, 465] with cost equal to -190.8.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 491] with cost equal to -729.44.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 55] with cost equal to -749.07.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 2, 144] with cost equal to -619.77.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 100] with cost equal to -752.45.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 110] with cost equal to -756.53.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 69, 155] with cost equal to -561.21.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 19, 306] with cost equal to -755.77.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 5 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 177] with cost equal to -684.54.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.64.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 274, 285] with cost equal to -275.48.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 208] with cost equal to -750.49.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 351, 273] with cost equal to -245.73.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.86.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.91.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.31.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 272] with cost equal to -728.49.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 52, 144] with cost equal to -679.69.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 54, 408] with cost equal to -599.35.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 138] with cost equal to -753.22.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 270] with cost equal to -698.94.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 44] with cost equal to -792.25.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 85, 147] with cost equal to -521.91.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 164, 265] with cost equal to -413.72.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.21.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.25.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 71, 130] with cost equal to -639.93.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.12.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 496] with cost equal to -674.56.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 397] with cost equal to -625.87.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.79.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.92.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.33.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.74.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.75.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.75.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.36.Process 7 launched on node kyle12.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 7 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 512, 160, 248, 227] with cost equal to -337.74.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 7 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 256, 416, 223, 131] with cost equal to -289.63.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 7 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 512, 384, 5, 190] with cost equal to -670.62.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 80, 44, 128] with cost equal to -548.42.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 145, 120] with cost equal to -490.94.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 256, 228] with cost equal to -273.7.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 96, 94, 121] with cost equal to -565.52.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 226, 448] with cost equal to -172.72.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 112, 10, 202] with cost equal to -602.57.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 122, 244] with cost equal to -341.0.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 7 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 240, 326] with cost equal to -316.21.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 260, 497] with cost equal to -194.98.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 7 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 272, 146, 146] with cost equal to -347.45.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 7 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 80, 34, 30] with cost equal to -612.47.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 7 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 441, 475] with cost equal to -207.52.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 7 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 342, 315] with cost equal to -290.72.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 335, 387] with cost equal to -188.78.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 487, 257] with cost equal to -200.46.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 22] with cost equal to -802.44.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 7 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 445, 449] with cost equal to -211.33.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 177, 177] with cost equal to -388.79.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 482, 215] with cost equal to -213.65.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 7 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 41, 318] with cost equal to -633.52.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 397, 20] with cost equal to -314.57.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 76, 431] with cost equal to -533.19.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 171, 511] with cost equal to -274.11.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 7 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 220, 453] with cost equal to -373.7.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 7 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 6, 486] with cost equal to -658.75.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 125, 409] with cost equal to -409.55.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 482, 221] with cost equal to -213.86.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 429, 289] with cost equal to -194.42.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 7 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 16] with cost equal to -698.38.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 7 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 427] with cost equal to -671.33.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 93] with cost equal to -753.57.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 456, 10] with cost equal to -403.46.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.27.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 26] with cost equal to -789.39.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 7 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 122, 468] with cost equal to -398.55.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 507] with cost equal to -667.17.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 461, 227] with cost equal to -219.3.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 296, 418] with cost equal to -196.89.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 328, 290] with cost equal to -241.34.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 74, 63] with cost equal to -582.33.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.06.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 112] with cost equal to -755.65.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 307, 241] with cost equal to -301.24.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.77.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.54.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 310] with cost equal to -710.95.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 43] with cost equal to -775.14.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 23, 216] with cost equal to -753.23.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 354, 141] with cost equal to -298.95.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 302, 485] with cost equal to -172.46.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 348] with cost equal to -701.81.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.04.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 253, 169] with cost equal to -312.91.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.98.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 7 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 368] with cost equal to -652.22.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 189, 478] with cost equal to -254.21.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.0.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.35.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 505] with cost equal to -673.68.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.87.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.53.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 35] with cost equal to -782.39.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.51.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 44] with cost equal to -769.05.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.47.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.25.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.54.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.12.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.41.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.58.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.98.Process 8 launched on node kyle13.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 8 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 256, 80, 115, 102] with cost equal to -469.61.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 256, 48, 105, 90] with cost equal to -414.44.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 133, 71] with cost equal to -333.0.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 48, 243, 114] with cost equal to -351.63.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 144, 133, 395] with cost equal to -233.69.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 117, 252] with cost equal to -422.29.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 40, 325] with cost equal to -651.06.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 512, 128, 115, 415] with cost equal to -426.42.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 456, 258] with cost equal to -212.5.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 192, 410, 221] with cost equal to -300.08.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 8 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 117, 343] with cost equal to -420.43.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 79, 177] with cost equal to -522.36.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 8 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 454, 160] with cost equal to -293.72.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 150, 56] with cost equal to -409.62.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 192, 101, 246] with cost equal to -491.82.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 19, 455] with cost equal to -695.24.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 8 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 192, 362, 498] with cost equal to -250.23.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 496, 498] with cost equal to -156.25.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 53, 393] with cost equal to -589.99.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 203, 424] with cost equal to -137.08.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 8 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 483, 140] with cost equal to -283.37.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 412, 187] with cost equal to -249.47.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 8 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 110, 378] with cost equal to -436.37.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 352, 465, 437] with cost equal to -147.15.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 8 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 39, 508] with cost equal to -597.86.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 124, 32] with cost equal to -388.94.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 324] with cost equal to -710.63.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 186, 501] with cost equal to -348.32.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 398] with cost equal to -696.82.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 200, 318] with cost equal to -340.89.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 298, 422] with cost equal to -194.27.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 449] with cost equal to -717.54.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 265] with cost equal to -689.82.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 98] with cost equal to -697.78.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 63, 156] with cost equal to -545.23.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 176, 481] with cost equal to -267.77.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 475, 298] with cost equal to -173.87.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 51, 34] with cost equal to -611.34.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 317] with cost equal to -644.57.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 165] with cost equal to -673.51.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.6.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 273] with cost equal to -696.85.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 411, 61] with cost equal to -400.06.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 68] with cost equal to -665.45.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.08.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 400] with cost equal to -701.84.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 19, 338] with cost equal to -715.16.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 337] with cost equal to -695.31.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 8 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -689.89.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 98, 201] with cost equal to -566.97.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 17, 56] with cost equal to -780.43.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 326] with cost equal to -577.16.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.99.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.93.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.26.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 450, 305] with cost equal to -175.51.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 432, 27] with cost equal to -394.44.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 345] with cost equal to -602.95.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.28.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 220, 457] with cost equal to -231.49.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.22.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 178] with cost equal to -696.76.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 8 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 255] with cost equal to -642.25.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 489] with cost equal to -700.75.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 8 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -690.06.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 311, 227] with cost equal to -289.59.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 491] with cost equal to -738.69.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 8 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -694.84.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.51.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.17.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.79.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.2.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.61.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.76.Process 2 launched on node kyle10.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 240, 60, 269] with cost equal to -569.54.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 2 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 256, 64, 95, 241] with cost equal to -486.98.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 256, 208, 411, 58] with cost equal to -304.2.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 192, 253, 390] with cost equal to -136.8.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 160, 169, 164] with cost equal to -257.93.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 2 by ant 1 : [512, 256, 512, 480, 105, 488] with cost equal to -216.79.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 104, 466] with cost equal to -451.53.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 80, 420, 419] with cost equal to -262.94.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 16, 461, 462] with cost equal to -265.45.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 2 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 208, 291, 474] with cost equal to -278.13.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 370, 184] with cost equal to -317.41.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 2 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 512, 177, 96] with cost equal to -395.19.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 169, 448] with cost equal to -369.45.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 192, 142, 86] with cost equal to -454.82.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 407, 2] with cost equal to -412.69.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 2 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 512, 53, 84] with cost equal to -621.58.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 159, 135] with cost equal to -309.97.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 2 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 264, 178] with cost equal to -274.61.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 192, 238, 92] with cost equal to -312.42.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 5, 187] with cost equal to -607.84.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 229, 470] with cost equal to -216.42.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 96, 437, 213] with cost equal to -300.2.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 24, 7] with cost equal to -665.45.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 159, 226] with cost equal to -260.58.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 88, 286] with cost equal to -547.62.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 2 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 491, 132] with cost equal to -283.15.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 2] with cost equal to -534.6.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 2 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 274, 189] with cost equal to -282.56.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 51, 118] with cost equal to -598.43.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 195, 59] with cost equal to -497.29.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 267, 192] with cost equal to -301.22.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 99, 260] with cost equal to -502.22.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 96, 317, 368] with cost equal to -272.12.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 89, 369] with cost equal to -483.93.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 164] with cost equal to -702.57.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 2 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 41, 116] with cost equal to -629.82.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 284, 107] with cost equal to -402.66.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 140] with cost equal to -707.89.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 318, 405] with cost equal to -264.71.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 247] with cost equal to -733.48.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 245, 343] with cost equal to -293.54.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 160, 143, 175] with cost equal to -479.05.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 21] with cost equal to -746.97.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 18, 51] with cost equal to -742.48.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 24] with cost equal to -779.53.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 380, 259] with cost equal to -241.82.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -771.11.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.04.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 366, 271] with cost equal to -238.74.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.58.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 200] with cost equal to -653.31.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 182, 295] with cost equal to -323.16.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 459, 49] with cost equal to -352.09.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 459] with cost equal to -710.05.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 371] with cost equal to -685.58.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 25, 52] with cost equal to -722.1.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 392] with cost equal to -635.15.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 143, 191] with cost equal to -260.67.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 2 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -680.4.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 451, 473] with cost equal to -122.17.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.86.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.72.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.93.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 476, 62] with cost equal to -240.6.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.89.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.6.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.33.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -773.09.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 427, 274] with cost equal to -203.88.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.43.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.41.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 419] with cost equal to -704.31.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -771.7.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.78.Process 1 launched on node kyle09.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 256, 496, 486, 242] with cost equal to -90.93.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 256, 80, 9, 52] with cost equal to -630.09.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 80, 36, 36] with cost equal to -630.24.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 153, 315] with cost equal to -271.0.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 89, 241] with cost equal to -434.28.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 16, 88, 254] with cost equal to -429.28.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 144, 93, 70] with cost equal to -424.69.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 1 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 430, 100] with cost equal to -295.43.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 1 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 144, 223, 399] with cost equal to -361.02.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 64, 26, 91] with cost equal to -590.85.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 1 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 313, 461] with cost equal to -321.55.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 220, 383] with cost equal to -306.46.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 1 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 273, 84] with cost equal to -309.06.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 1 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 163, 352] with cost equal to -337.01.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 1 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 274, 232] with cost equal to -334.05.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 1 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 202, 402] with cost equal to -374.52.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 417, 449] with cost equal to -138.29.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 277] with cost equal to -687.35.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 1 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 224, 240] with cost equal to -346.1.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 350, 400] with cost equal to -175.42.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 1 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 329, 31] with cost equal to -281.17.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 1 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 41, 174] with cost equal to -616.8.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 3, 110] with cost equal to -688.87.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 55, 425] with cost equal to -578.8.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 34, 384] with cost equal to -671.97.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 222, 464] with cost equal to -168.33.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 454, 67] with cost equal to -342.85.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 150] with cost equal to -715.08.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 103, 255] with cost equal to -499.31.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.16.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 125] with cost equal to -753.26.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 136] with cost equal to -724.88.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 9, 335] with cost equal to -747.4.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 1 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 47, 224] with cost equal to -617.32.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 163, 296] with cost equal to -358.96.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 252] with cost equal to -698.79.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 23, 468] with cost equal to -711.0.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 290] with cost equal to -619.53.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 42, 446] with cost equal to -639.5.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 369] with cost equal to -619.74.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 362, 183] with cost equal to -264.46.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 211] with cost equal to -730.16.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.14.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 50, 197] with cost equal to -673.19.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 136] with cost equal to -733.02.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 150, 166] with cost equal to -482.37.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 412, 87] with cost equal to -377.29.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 423, 232] with cost equal to -236.27.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 23, 221] with cost equal to -758.06.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.81.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 1 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 315] with cost equal to -668.55.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 124] with cost equal to -741.44.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 260] with cost equal to -698.55.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 502] with cost equal to -673.63.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 297, 440] with cost equal to -187.85.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.09.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 1 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 9, 235] with cost equal to -671.04.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.0.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 18, 268] with cost equal to -712.37.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.04.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 72] with cost equal to -804.21.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 23, 185] with cost equal to -717.34.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.23.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 475] with cost equal to -709.61.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.79.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.14.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 1 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -704.6.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.01.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.18.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.13.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 203] with cost equal to -728.24.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.61.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 121] with cost equal to -778.5.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 199] with cost equal to -693.68.Process 13 launched on node kyle15.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 13 by ant 0 : [512, 256, 512, 80, 90, 323] with cost equal to -451.8.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 13 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 256, 112, 240, 131] with cost equal to -330.45.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 176, 96, 134] with cost equal to -260.57.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 57, 211] with cost equal to -533.09.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 35, 53] with cost equal to -619.72.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 466, 192] with cost equal to -231.25.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 33, 405] with cost equal to -651.01.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 13 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 19, 342] with cost equal to -694.62.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 13 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 447, 436] with cost equal to -263.16.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 13 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 80, 444, 309] with cost equal to -308.82.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 13 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 352, 25] with cost equal to -319.66.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 13 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 480, 69, 501] with cost equal to -516.82.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 428, 113] with cost equal to -350.4.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 306, 101] with cost equal to -342.95.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 13 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 123, 323] with cost equal to -416.52.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 156, 108] with cost equal to -399.83.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 13 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 235, 374] with cost equal to -325.32.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 13 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 304, 3, 291] with cost equal to -595.77.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 13 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 380, 379] with cost equal to -251.37.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 96, 124, 349] with cost equal to -283.95.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 430] with cost equal to -601.99.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 476, 233] with cost equal to -210.96.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 13 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 359, 87] with cost equal to -323.15.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 256, 93, 96] with cost equal to -629.32.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 412, 481] with cost equal to -189.13.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.98.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 16, 403] with cost equal to -707.33.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 13 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 310, 114] with cost equal to -313.29.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 252, 480] with cost equal to -203.72.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 273, 196] with cost equal to -302.1.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 13 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 202] with cost equal to -679.03.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 13 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 349, 333] with cost equal to -278.05.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 13 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 365, 128] with cost equal to -311.37.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 13 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 384, 185, 439] with cost equal to -276.04.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 30, 33] with cost equal to -731.61.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 3] with cost equal to -669.48.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 18] with cost equal to -782.43.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 49] with cost equal to -812.94.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 110, 451] with cost equal to -445.71.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.31.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 422, 159] with cost equal to -263.25.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 442] with cost equal to -721.29.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 23, 352] with cost equal to -710.07.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 286, 215] with cost equal to -299.08.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 168, 140] with cost equal to -371.28.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 371] with cost equal to -696.19.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.56.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 364] with cost equal to -684.74.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 366, 225] with cost equal to -262.61.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 13 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 313, 116] with cost equal to -313.42.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 27, 384] with cost equal to -718.19.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.27.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 24, 192] with cost equal to -737.95.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 24, 437] with cost equal to -662.58.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 181, 1] with cost equal to -404.22.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 84, 316] with cost equal to -549.47.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 469] with cost equal to -627.16.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.99.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.17.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 133, 49] with cost equal to -567.91.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.3.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 297] with cost equal to -702.14.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.9.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.02.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.51.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 349] with cost equal to -635.66.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.04.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 470, 67] with cost equal to -336.88.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.84.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 237, 235] with cost equal to -355.66.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.31.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 86] with cost equal to -765.18.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 269, 222] with cost equal to -311.17.Process 6 launched on node kyle12.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 35, 64] with cost equal to -609.19.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 6 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 480, 348, 178] with cost equal to -288.61.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 144, 227, 361] with cost equal to -177.94.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 80, 75, 204] with cost equal to -460.87.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 399, 410] with cost equal to -212.17.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 163, 50] with cost equal to -450.26.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 160, 232, 353] with cost equal to -168.22.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 94, 249] with cost equal to -395.13.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 24, 39] with cost equal to -661.73.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 6 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 112, 305, 20] with cost equal to -346.44.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 243, 153] with cost equal to -308.66.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 30, 103] with cost equal to -572.56.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 64, 209, 168] with cost equal to -452.3.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 6 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 266, 484] with cost equal to -352.01.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 107, 63] with cost equal to -439.15.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 6 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 144, 350, 34] with cost equal to -340.82.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 131, 75] with cost equal to -426.19.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 6 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 288, 233, 420] with cost equal to -281.26.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 39, 120] with cost equal to -712.84.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 9, 385] with cost equal to -667.83.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 288, 169] with cost equal to -282.6.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 160, 242, 320] with cost equal to -175.21.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 23, 281] with cost equal to -613.27.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 134, 507] with cost equal to -358.99.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 39, 194] with cost equal to -602.99.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 256, 232] with cost equal to -333.1.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 269, 293] with cost equal to -298.75.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 6 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 373, 312] with cost equal to -292.48.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 68, 95] with cost equal to -589.27.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 121] with cost equal to -744.06.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 9, 143] with cost equal to -745.67.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 4] with cost equal to -696.0.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 298, 159] with cost equal to -306.21.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 19, 257] with cost equal to -733.75.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 484, 168] with cost equal to -279.26.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 260] with cost equal to -666.36.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -703.05.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 6 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 44, 110] with cost equal to -623.95.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 72] with cost equal to -759.37.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 203] with cost equal to -669.53.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 272, 207, 14] with cost equal to -332.05.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.69.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 310] with cost equal to -651.78.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 61, 310] with cost equal to -524.05.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 496, 494] with cost equal to -109.36.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 232, 438] with cost equal to -227.54.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 51, 335] with cost equal to -561.84.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 459, 287] with cost equal to -183.45.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 6 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -696.05.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 151, 424] with cost equal to -311.96.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 411] with cost equal to -707.03.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 423] with cost equal to -713.31.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 307] with cost equal to -688.69.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.77.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 329] with cost equal to -622.75.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.28.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.88.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 254] with cost equal to -697.38.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.21.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.91.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 101, 181] with cost equal to -466.07.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 95, 109] with cost equal to -537.39.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 207, 380] with cost equal to -263.93.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.48.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.53.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.19.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.58.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 97, 230] with cost equal to -526.72.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 370] with cost equal to -623.82.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 11] with cost equal to -753.54.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.27.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.9.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 263, 86] with cost equal to -380.65.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.99.Process 4 launched on node kyle11.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 144, 40, 334] with cost equal to -543.43.
+Path followed at iteration 0 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 112, 322, 79] with cost equal to -350.18.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 121, 193] with cost equal to -305.48.
+Path followed at iteration 1 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 176, 225, 468] with cost equal to -133.29.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 256, 48, 56, 140] with cost equal to -474.28.
+Path followed at iteration 2 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 47, 174] with cost equal to -611.64.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 4, 337] with cost equal to -625.6.
+Path followed at iteration 3 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 208, 20, 93] with cost equal to -684.23.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 4 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 192, 379, 436] with cost equal to -251.63.
+Path followed at iteration 4 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 132, 418] with cost equal to -404.28.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 315, 243] with cost equal to -376.78.
+Path followed at iteration 5 on process 4 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 249, 269] with cost equal to -270.47.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 4 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 368, 508] with cost equal to -238.94.
+Path followed at iteration 6 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 512, 128, 114, 166] with cost equal to -310.51.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 4 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 256, 304, 135, 146] with cost equal to -302.34.
+Path followed at iteration 7 on process 4 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 128, 101, 186] with cost equal to -454.4.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 39] with cost equal to -774.73.
+Path followed at iteration 8 on process 4 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 250, 417] with cost equal to -303.67.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 302, 115] with cost equal to -403.73.
+Path followed at iteration 9 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 256, 256, 208, 131, 104] with cost equal to -230.13.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 378, 193] with cost equal to -297.44.
+Path followed at iteration 10 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 213, 312] with cost equal to -288.88.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 4 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 487, 460] with cost equal to -199.23.
+Path followed at iteration 11 on process 4 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 379, 461] with cost equal to -237.18.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 395, 464] with cost equal to -204.14.
+Path followed at iteration 12 on process 4 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 393, 290] with cost equal to -291.43.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 315, 196] with cost equal to -284.58.
+Path followed at iteration 13 on process 4 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 67, 54] with cost equal to -569.08.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 4 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 181, 136] with cost equal to -365.42.
+Path followed at iteration 14 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 121, 206] with cost equal to -482.65.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.96.
+Path followed at iteration 15 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 112] with cost equal to -758.79.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 16, 159, 136] with cost equal to -393.35.
+Path followed at iteration 16 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 66, 292] with cost equal to -557.84.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 55, 110] with cost equal to -691.54.
+Path followed at iteration 17 on process 4 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 385, 43] with cost equal to -321.75.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 180, 142] with cost equal to -365.81.
+Path followed at iteration 18 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 241] with cost equal to -721.65.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 23, 407] with cost equal to -720.21.
+Path followed at iteration 19 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 237, 51] with cost equal to -388.41.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -750.43.
+Path followed at iteration 20 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 413, 495] with cost equal to -130.39.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 181, 493] with cost equal to -262.06.
+Path followed at iteration 21 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 360, 145] with cost equal to -280.56.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 82, 201] with cost equal to -640.2.
+Path followed at iteration 22 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 405, 368] with cost equal to -167.78.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 115] with cost equal to -723.17.
+Path followed at iteration 23 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 214, 250] with cost equal to -387.56.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.99.
+Path followed at iteration 24 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 411, 431] with cost equal to -145.81.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 466, 374] with cost equal to -145.63.
+Path followed at iteration 25 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 98] with cost equal to -775.65.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 285, 21] with cost equal to -412.01.
+Path followed at iteration 26 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 440, 123] with cost equal to -331.71.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 112] with cost equal to -788.81.
+Path followed at iteration 27 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 266] with cost equal to -730.67.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 419] with cost equal to -729.41.
+Path followed at iteration 28 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 61, 123] with cost equal to -714.93.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 474, 73] with cost equal to -333.92.
+Path followed at iteration 29 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.39.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.27.
+Path followed at iteration 30 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.2.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 483, 101] with cost equal to -327.43.
+Path followed at iteration 31 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 205, 341] with cost equal to -314.87.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.07.
+Path followed at iteration 32 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.33.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.58.
+Path followed at iteration 33 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.75.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.63.
+Path followed at iteration 34 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.33.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.81.
+Path followed at iteration 35 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.32.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 262, 478] with cost equal to -196.74.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.43.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.65.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.1.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 436] with cost equal to -603.08.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.33.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 173] with cost equal to -693.91.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.95.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.93.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.74.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.08.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 326] with cost equal to -598.75.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.53.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.82.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 168, 499] with cost equal to -282.86.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.01.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.63.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.01.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.81.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.19.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.47.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.08.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.69.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.36.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.15.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.79.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.72.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.64.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.33.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.53.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.76.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.44.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.98.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.75.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.97.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.69.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.01.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.89.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.54.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.66.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.95.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.41.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.98.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.1.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.7.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.37.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.18.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.0.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.4.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.44.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.69.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.88.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.6.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.31.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.8.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.0.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.56.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.99.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.68.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.15.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 112] with cost equal to -762.66.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.95.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.65.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.78.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.75.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.57.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.58.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.38.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.01.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.47.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.89.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.37.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.06.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.02.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.77.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.59.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.59.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.77.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.43.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 9 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 406, 380] with cost equal to -244.26.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.15.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.83.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.62.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 322, 499] with cost equal to -225.97.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.07.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 299] with cost equal to -708.98.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 423] with cost equal to -707.72.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.0.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 471, 162] with cost equal to -250.64.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.91.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.44.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.46.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.25.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.97.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.33.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.44.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.21.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.05.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.47.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.34.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.73.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.17.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.17.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.35.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.15.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.86.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.71.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 179, 471] with cost equal to -264.75.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.14.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.65.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.87.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.93.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.66.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.66.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.03.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.28.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.29.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.8.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.2.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.73.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.64.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.38.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.78.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.84.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.68.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.02.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.9.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.59.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.8.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.16.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.68.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.01.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.28.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.28.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.11.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.78.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.42.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.85.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.28.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.96.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.74.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.17.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.05.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.89.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.18.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.11.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.74.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.43.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.98.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 228] with cost equal to -740.48.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.63.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 180] with cost equal to -712.04.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.03.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 351] with cost equal to -693.08.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.92.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.43.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.64.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.76.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.51.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.45.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.78.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.86.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.46.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.55.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.44.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.03.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.5.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.53.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.08.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.93.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.69.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.97.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.14.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.99.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.34.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.2.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.07.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 348] with cost equal to -704.02.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.43.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.17.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.85.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.56.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.24.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.99.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.22.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.24.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.62.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.0.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.07.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.82.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.5.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.01.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.88.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.79.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.86.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.53.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.37.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.7.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.37.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.58.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.82.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.34.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.18.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.64.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.74.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.75.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.34.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.42.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.43.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.79.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.22.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.45.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.6.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.28.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.12.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.44.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.52.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.36.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.3.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.51.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.24.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.41.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.23.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 253, 440] with cost equal to -212.9.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.62.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.92.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.14.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.34.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.04.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.93.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.18.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 124, 374] with cost equal to -400.01.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 57] with cost equal to -802.03.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.13.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.57.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 348, 218] with cost equal to -269.75.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.18.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.21.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.22.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.03.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.64.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.19.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.14.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.42.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.78.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -842.76.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.16.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 466] with cost equal to -713.96.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.14.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.79.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.26.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.8.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.41.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.34.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.51.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.19.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.49.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.84.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.33.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.59.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.67.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.29.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.61.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.69.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.65.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.88.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.07.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.21.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.47.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.97.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.99.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.6.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.48.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.63.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.21.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.94.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.45.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.54.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.89.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.28.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.32.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.99.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.59.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.34.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.37.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.01.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.8.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.31.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.2.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.98.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.92.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.33.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.86.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.44.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.42.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.55.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.92.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 101] with cost equal to -729.37.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.7.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 310, 453] with cost equal to -180.8.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.71.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 2] with cost equal to -576.0.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.32.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.74.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.32.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 497] with cost equal to -670.07.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.83.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.11.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 261] with cost equal to -708.29.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.81.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.97.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.65.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.01.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.37.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.88.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.78.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 157, 222] with cost equal to -502.3.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.07.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.3.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.18.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.1.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.3.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.84.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.32.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.23.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.73.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.31.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.33.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.64.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.27.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.87.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.43.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.46.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.55.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.3.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.76.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.13.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.14.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.29.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.9.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.43.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.43.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.57.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.25.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.71.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.35.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.19.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.54.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.22.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.19.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.06.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.68.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.54.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.29.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.17.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.05.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.52.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.12.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.31.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.4.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.09.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.62.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.3.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.57.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.35.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.78.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.59.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.06.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.85.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.92.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.38.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.4.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 119, 466] with cost equal to -414.15.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.28.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.94.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.5.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.34.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 276, 74] with cost equal to -360.48.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.26.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.31.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.9.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.4.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 12 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 259, 512] with cost equal to -319.18.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.28.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.49.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 407] with cost equal to -710.94.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 439] with cost equal to -711.7.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.44.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.38.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.87.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.03.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.14.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.69.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.26.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.25.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.75.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.13.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.85.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.02.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.9.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.89.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.26.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.39.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.28.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.41.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.58.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.62.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.33.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.96.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.6.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.24.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.47.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.22.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.29.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.8.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.91.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.29.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.25.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.81.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.49.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.29.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.84.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.48.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.02.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.46.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.93.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.5.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.08.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.31.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.06.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.8.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.96.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.9.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.62.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.17.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.01.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.09.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.91.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.45.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.62.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.74.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.2.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.9.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.61.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.64.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.26.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 233] with cost equal to -745.66.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.5.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 455] with cost equal to -614.64.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.85.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.39.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.43.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.39.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.69.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 58] with cost equal to -809.35.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 164] with cost equal to -679.69.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.37.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.74.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.35.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.51.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 378] with cost equal to -694.49.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.21.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.61.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 3 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -696.4.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.45.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.48.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.38.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.36.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.6.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.17.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.78.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.36.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.91.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.03.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.29.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.81.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 112] with cost equal to -746.55.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.34.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.26.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.74.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.94.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 285] with cost equal to -694.27.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.51.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.81.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.82.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.07.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.48.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.0.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.41.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.2.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.21.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.76.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.7.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.01.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.47.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.02.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.76.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.01.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.78.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.16.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 256, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -732.71.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.36.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.77.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.13.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.86.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.71.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.26.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.89.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.35.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.71.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.78.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.9.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.29.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.38.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.14.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.3.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.57.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.59.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.83.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.24.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 427] with cost equal to -709.12.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 452, 315] with cost equal to -173.23.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.0.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.61.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 158, 435] with cost equal to -304.99.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.62.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.42.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 125] with cost equal to -706.14.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.09.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.59.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.55.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 421, 174] with cost equal to -254.77.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.97.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.65.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.87.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.17.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.6.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.88.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.79.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.82.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.38.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.11.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.5.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.81.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.58.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.46.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 264, 454] with cost equal to -199.29.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.07.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.92.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.68.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.92.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.83.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.7.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.67.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.84.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.8.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.59.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.42.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.38.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.77.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.57.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.28.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.15.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.86.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.62.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.57.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.36.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.19.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 201, 165] with cost equal to -370.13.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.84.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.92.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.54.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.35.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.67.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.4.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.57.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 78] with cost equal to -785.21.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.69.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 67, 270] with cost equal to -568.27.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.41.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.92.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.05.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.28.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.02.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.64.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.01.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.09.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.67.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.48.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.12.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.95.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.71.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.58.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.63.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 98] with cost equal to -726.24.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.53.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.69.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 485] with cost equal to -710.21.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 128, 377, 155] with cost equal to -285.79.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.13.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 411, 49] with cost equal to -387.45.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.33.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 136] with cost equal to -731.11.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.29.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 412] with cost equal to -712.52.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 476] with cost equal to -715.93.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.52.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.76.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.48.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.5.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 292] with cost equal to -697.9.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.7.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 253, 444] with cost equal to -214.57.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.03.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.21.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 348] with cost equal to -633.67.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 39] with cost equal to -747.42.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.57.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.79.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 51, 7] with cost equal to -746.32.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.12.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 161] with cost equal to -695.99.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.99.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.93.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.14.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 144, 420, 382] with cost equal to -199.52.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.05.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.15.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.27.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.74.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.99.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.31.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 14 by ant 0 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -695.71.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.55.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.06.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.38.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.37.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.86.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.8.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.3.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.92.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.36.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.61.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.99.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.2.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.45.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.99.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.28.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.37.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.27.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.91.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.77.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.24.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.32.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.33.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.36.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.91.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.43.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.02.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.13.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.97.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.19.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.64.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -771.07.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.42.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.8.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.71.
+Path followed at iteration 36 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.75.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.8.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 15 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 46] with cost equal to -684.82.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.58.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.99.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.61.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.05.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.89.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.69.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.79.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.99.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 113, 251] with cost equal to -531.53.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 345, 291] with cost equal to -230.82.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.66.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.01.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 239, 181] with cost equal to -335.6.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.38.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.88.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.45.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.29.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.02.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.54.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.15.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.18.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.62.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.73.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.38.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.42.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 453, 190] with cost equal to -234.04.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.62.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.92.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.25.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.49.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.41.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.38.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.34.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.13.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.5.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.92.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 463, 230] with cost equal to -215.33.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.13.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.38.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.0.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.03.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.43.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.33.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.74.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.22.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.73.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.3.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.76.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.54.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.66.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 245, 412] with cost equal to -224.51.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.62.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.21.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.56.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.19.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.92.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.91.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.67.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.37.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.32.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.74.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.02.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.93.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.88.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.16.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.24.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.36.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.56.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.66.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.32.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.36.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 260] with cost equal to -745.8.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.33.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.72.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.77.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 157] with cost equal to -690.41.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.18.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.72.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.61.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.77.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.34.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 415] with cost equal to -703.39.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 296, 152] with cost equal to -301.85.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.37.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.94.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.64.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.38.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.42.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.58.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.33.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.43.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.52.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.95.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.88.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.61.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.25.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.27.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.08.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.72.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.04.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.39.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.69.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 127, 491] with cost equal to -383.37.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.27.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.09.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.99.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.56.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.22.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.58.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.98.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.1.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.02.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.75.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.43.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.46.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.65.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.9.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.41.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.77.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.08.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.4.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.45.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.48.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.93.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.5.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.53.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.68.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.31.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.54.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.03.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.21.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.44.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.22.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.7.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.96.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.67.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.81.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.42.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.07.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.86.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.13.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.89.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.12.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.52.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.5.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.25.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.37.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.82.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 136] with cost equal to -760.65.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.53.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.37.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 208] with cost equal to -751.02.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.8.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.68.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.73.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.07.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.27.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.53.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.75.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.67.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.47.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.4.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.92.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.73.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.47.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.07.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.11.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.21.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.93.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 230, 194] with cost equal to -349.64.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.04.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.93.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.39.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.33.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.36.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.54.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.82.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.11.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.73.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.65.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.26.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.17.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.39.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.78.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.56.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.98.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.38.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.67.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.26.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.9.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.41.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.73.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.75.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.34.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.94.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.64.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.83.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.62.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.35.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.88.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.37.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.09.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 465] with cost equal to -601.26.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.55.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.22.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.49.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.59.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.94.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.6.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.42.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.19.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.03.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.34.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.19.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.96.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.89.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.62.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.83.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.1.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 379] with cost equal to -686.57.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.35.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.49.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.81.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.88.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.87.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 142, 379] with cost equal to -347.56.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.67.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.22.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.98.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.79.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.0.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.05.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.02.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.72.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.89.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.66.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.42.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.6.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 36, 449] with cost equal to -635.96.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.83.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 250, 330] with cost equal to -263.54.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.68.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.22.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.66.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.09.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.69.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.1.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 19, 383] with cost equal to -743.17.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.5.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.39.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.38.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 489] with cost equal to -721.24.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.44.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.98.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.85.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.93.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.05.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 288, 504] with cost equal to -178.16.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.73.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.38.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.53.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.82.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.27.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.33.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.78.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.69.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.09.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.79.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.1.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.16.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.49.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.06.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.18.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.73.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.33.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.27.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.28.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.74.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.61.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.77.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.31.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.38.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.44.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.97.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.75.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.72.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.27.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.78.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.04.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.07.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.52.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.88.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.92.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.6.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.52.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.12.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 44, 448] with cost equal to -634.66.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.63.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.32.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.37.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.75.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.32.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.01.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.99.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.76.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.41.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.64.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.67.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.92.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.35.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.05.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.83.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.98.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.09.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.55.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.1.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.3.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.31.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.11.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.81.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.1.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.93.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.48.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.43.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.89.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.24.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.94.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.7.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.51.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.6.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.27.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.31.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 6 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -695.71.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.33.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.61.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.76.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.75.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.01.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 46] with cost equal to -777.66.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.99.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.3.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.21.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.66.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.32.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.55.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.86.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.04.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.1.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.09.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 227] with cost equal to -746.53.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.55.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.23.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.22.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.09.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.48.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.72.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.48.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.37.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.1.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.66.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.74.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.98.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.55.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.8.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.78.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.01.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.47.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 246] with cost equal to -735.11.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.66.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.53.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 452, 426] with cost equal to -134.33.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 325, 127] with cost equal to -332.81.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -773.42.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.88.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.14.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.28.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 19, 312] with cost equal to -725.74.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.64.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.7.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.55.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 484, 6] with cost equal to -389.97.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.95.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.69.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.99.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 39, 77] with cost equal to -762.88.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.17.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.32.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.48.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.54.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.12.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.29.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 237, 4] with cost equal to -439.41.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -772.4.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.26.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.1.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.69.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.57.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.81.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.27.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.76.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.88.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.75.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.98.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.57.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -772.99.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -764.11.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.89.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.64.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.64.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.88.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -770.33.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.91.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.76.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.64.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.21.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.42.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -766.1.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.2.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -770.61.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -770.57.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.55.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.62.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.66.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.29.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.24.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.03.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.96.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.58.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.78.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.22.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.97.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.46.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.0.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.91.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.25.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.46.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.05.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.74.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.44.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.18.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.84.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.34.
+Path followed at iteration 37 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.32.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.45.
+Path followed at iteration 38 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.25.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.98.
+Path followed at iteration 39 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.85.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.72.
+Path followed at iteration 40 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.5.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.53.
+Path followed at iteration 41 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.46.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.42.
+Path followed at iteration 42 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.01.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.84.
+Path followed at iteration 43 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.01.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.28.
+Path followed at iteration 44 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 150] with cost equal to -711.62.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.61.
+Path followed at iteration 45 on process 1 by ant 1 : [512, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -700.23.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.23.
+Path followed at iteration 46 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.53.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.72.
+Path followed at iteration 47 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.03.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 393, 354] with cost equal to -175.82.
+Path followed at iteration 48 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.87.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.24.
+Path followed at iteration 49 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.29.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.86.
+Path followed at iteration 50 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.49.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.46.
+Path followed at iteration 51 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.4.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.64.
+Path followed at iteration 52 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.4.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.8.
+Path followed at iteration 53 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.93.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.62.
+Path followed at iteration 54 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.39.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.2.
+Path followed at iteration 55 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.9.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.47.
+Path followed at iteration 56 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.67.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.85.
+Path followed at iteration 57 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.93.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.53.
+Path followed at iteration 58 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.43.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.48.
+Path followed at iteration 59 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.46.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.51.
+Path followed at iteration 60 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.25.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.8.
+Path followed at iteration 61 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.8.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.85.
+Path followed at iteration 62 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.77.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.25.
+Path followed at iteration 63 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.51.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.72.
+Path followed at iteration 64 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.12.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.57.
+Path followed at iteration 65 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.38.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.09.
+Path followed at iteration 66 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.17.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.7.
+Path followed at iteration 67 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.1.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.42.
+Path followed at iteration 68 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.58.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.46.
+Path followed at iteration 69 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.55.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.83.
+Path followed at iteration 70 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.58.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.05.
+Path followed at iteration 71 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.08.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.07.
+Path followed at iteration 72 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.11.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.61.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.41.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 41, 358] with cost equal to -613.37.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.92.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.82.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.8.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.81.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.59.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.81.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.33.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.71.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.88.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.88.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.13.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.67.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.18.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.68.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.39.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.22.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.32.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.33.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.51.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.34.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.24.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.02.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.49.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.29.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.2.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.68.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.79.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.92.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.34.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.57.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.43.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.66.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.36.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.16.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.38.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.49.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.43.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.75.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.86.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.29.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.8.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.0.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.99.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.64.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.29.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.1.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.63.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.99.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.63.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.32.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.31.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.02.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.67.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.36.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.94.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.15.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.53.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.67.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.27.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.27.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.09.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.09.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.57.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.89.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.26.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.89.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.02.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.84.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.83.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.04.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.36.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.56.
+
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.5.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.56.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.47.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.99.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.55.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.73.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.94.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.84.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.53.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.25.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.79.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.41.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.07.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.59.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.42.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.14.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.59.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.32.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.61.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.48.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.59.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.57.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.83.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.44.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.31.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.81.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.86.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.63.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.18.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.06.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.93.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.64.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.42.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.26.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.48.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.34.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.69.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.76.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.01.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.35.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.19.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.12.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.23.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.87.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.56.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.91.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.71.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.64.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.36.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.71.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.17.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.59.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.45.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.96.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.38.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.29.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.26.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.26.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.04.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.59.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.02.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.25.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.33.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.01.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.03.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.32.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.19.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.57.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.69.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.92.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.35.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.9.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.95.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.57.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.72.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.99.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.98.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.53.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.22.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.52.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.84.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.37.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.45.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.38.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.66.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.29.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.06.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.75.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.16.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.06.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.98.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.88.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.69.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.3.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.02.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.09.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.96.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.84.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.25.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.26.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.79.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.42.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.12.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.55.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.69.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.37.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.72.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.73.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.79.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.3.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.76.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.25.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.69.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.58.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.62.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.26.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.36.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.72.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.87.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.76.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.93.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.87.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.21.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.36.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.89.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.6.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.58.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.14.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.93.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.36.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.86.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.37.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.62.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.74.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.77.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.78.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.25.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.12.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.09.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.02.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.08.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.37.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.51.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.86.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.73.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.74.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.91.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.96.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.5.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.67.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.83.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.74.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.15.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.21.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.85.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.4.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.34.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.66.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.61.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.08.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.37.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.14.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.21.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.43.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.12.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.28.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.75.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.22.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.56.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.27.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.99.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.57.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.51.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.54.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.73.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.9.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.1.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.16.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.3.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.04.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.31.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.69.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.45.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.57.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.7.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.42.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.29.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.07.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.05.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.61.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.61.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.68.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.86.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.52.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.66.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.69.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.06.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.17.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.76.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.3.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.12.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.42.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.99.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.6.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.07.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.01.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.96.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.34.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.95.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.38.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.21.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.07.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.96.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.52.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.83.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.99.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.81.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.91.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.97.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.64.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.74.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.63.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.06.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.34.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.39.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.15.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.06.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.26.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.18.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.38.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.99.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.7.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.15.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.33.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.04.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.15.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.54.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.12.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.1.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.0.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.07.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.09.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.82.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.21.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.65.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.94.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.97.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.41.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.16.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.86.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.58.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.33.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.6.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.08.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.97.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.76.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.64.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.78.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.44.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.6.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.33.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.04.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.52.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.89.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.9.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.75.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.78.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.55.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.06.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.52.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.16.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.95.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.02.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.79.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.59.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.38.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.51.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.29.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.36.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.84.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.69.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.72.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.16.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.45.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.31.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.41.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.8.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.34.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.15.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.64.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.38.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.71.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.95.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.88.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.77.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.55.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.72.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.91.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.04.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.56.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.29.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.96.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.1.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.27.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.1.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.11.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.78.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.6.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.68.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.21.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.76.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.48.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.15.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.92.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.38.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.94.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.99.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.93.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.25.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.43.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.93.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.38.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.97.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.08.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.74.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.36.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.5.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.63.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.45.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.51.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.56.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.29.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.02.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.88.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.39.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.26.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.86.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.21.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.3.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.86.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.26.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.95.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.1.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.23.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.19.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.41.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.41.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.89.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.88.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.13.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.38.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.5.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.07.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.53.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.89.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.67.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.76.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.73.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.7.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.32.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.73.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.49.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.29.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.76.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.23.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.6.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.59.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.22.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.81.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.84.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.69.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.28.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.31.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.66.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.51.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.64.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.37.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.21.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.13.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.89.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.06.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.75.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.13.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.77.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.12.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.77.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.14.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.92.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.46.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.21.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.13.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.32.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.97.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.43.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.24.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.15.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.69.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.16.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.62.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.65.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.24.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.52.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.29.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.14.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.63.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.53.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.18.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.09.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.55.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.06.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.57.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.13.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.07.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.67.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.0.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.42.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.57.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.01.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.01.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.18.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.21.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.04.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.49.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.38.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.88.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.26.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.02.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.23.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.03.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.68.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.47.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.54.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.12.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.16.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.49.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.67.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.27.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.08.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.66.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.73.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.21.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.24.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.71.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.85.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.16.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.17.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.13.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.97.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.61.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.23.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.75.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.98.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.9.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.84.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.19.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.88.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.92.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.25.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.32.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.97.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.55.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.28.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.41.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.38.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.4.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.21.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.65.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.21.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.96.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.29.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.5.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.35.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.11.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.2.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.12.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.38.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.35.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.19.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.06.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.77.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.74.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.11.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.06.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.05.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.26.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.24.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.46.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.28.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.43.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.77.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.22.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.01.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.27.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.69.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.83.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.43.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.82.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.53.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.16.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.01.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.02.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.8.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.86.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.9.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.18.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.84.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.4.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.44.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.64.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.41.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.97.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.84.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.93.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.87.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.59.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.33.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.14.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.67.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.8.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.99.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.42.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.21.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.55.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.57.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.08.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.29.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.34.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.38.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.65.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.88.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.44.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.15.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.89.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.71.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.94.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.14.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.73.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.18.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.28.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.35.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.21.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.83.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.78.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.16.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.8.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.75.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.63.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.45.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.08.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.31.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.13.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.19.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.0.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.35.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.44.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.2.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.0.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.11.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.02.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.36.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.45.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.88.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.24.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.54.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.3.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.79.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.21.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.45.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.25.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.2.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.41.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.72.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.8.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.97.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.44.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.89.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.84.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.21.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.07.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.09.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.07.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.32.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.38.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.4.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.47.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.61.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.43.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.05.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.9.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.96.
+Path followed at iteration 73 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.24.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.58.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.06.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.22.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.47.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.03.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.47.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.3.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.54.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.9.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.39.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.92.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.33.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.31.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.41.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.68.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.82.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.85.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.42.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.51.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.66.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.79.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.38.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.7.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.46.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.89.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.48.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.52.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.74.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.76.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.89.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.15.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.16.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.01.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.42.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.64.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.24.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.79.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.28.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.83.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.49.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.14.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.27.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.64.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.1.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.3.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.86.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.32.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.92.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.21.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.66.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.15.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.69.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.64.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.33.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.97.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.05.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.75.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.42.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.4.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.03.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.29.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.23.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.93.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.92.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.68.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.01.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.36.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.28.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.59.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.75.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.96.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.37.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.35.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.35.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.18.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.85.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.08.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.1.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.65.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.37.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.1.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.35.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.65.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.05.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.69.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.58.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.3.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.92.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.0.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.18.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.72.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.55.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.46.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.75.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.36.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.86.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.02.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.61.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.39.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.43.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.78.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.28.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.5.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.32.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.8.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.38.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.76.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.74.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.42.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.19.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.62.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.8.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.7.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.78.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.08.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.83.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.7.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.19.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.32.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.01.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.8.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.74.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.47.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.79.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.77.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.76.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.44.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.91.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.63.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.44.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.41.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.55.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.84.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.69.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.59.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.47.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.1.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.07.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.12.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.1.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.03.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.24.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.54.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.71.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.98.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.33.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.26.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.61.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.98.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.51.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.39.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.27.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.61.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.65.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.08.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.56.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.16.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.65.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.48.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.64.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.87.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.82.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.64.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.98.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.81.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.05.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.56.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.73.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.7.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.57.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.8.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.52.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.83.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.89.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.81.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.7.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.51.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.83.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.71.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.62.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.26.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.17.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.22.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.91.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.8.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.69.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.81.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.04.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.89.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.95.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.58.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.48.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.99.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.88.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.59.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.7.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.94.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.82.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.83.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.24.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.24.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.61.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.66.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.88.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.94.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.21.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.3.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.41.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.43.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.68.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.6.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.24.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.05.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.15.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.04.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.28.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.97.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.65.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.88.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.79.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.4.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.75.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.58.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.26.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.29.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.62.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.6.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.9.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.74.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.74.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.37.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.46.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.84.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.01.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.21.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.84.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.23.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.76.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.5.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.41.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.28.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.23.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.38.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.77.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.43.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.8.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.85.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.62.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.62.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.57.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.43.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.13.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.81.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.3.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.92.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.42.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.48.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.2.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.65.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.57.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.81.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.81.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.16.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.08.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.07.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.42.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.54.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.42.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.12.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.81.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.81.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.57.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.4.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.11.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.18.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.9.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.32.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.36.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.35.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.41.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.91.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.43.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.92.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.33.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.54.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.13.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.75.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.84.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.47.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.99.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.16.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.81.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.81.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.69.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.29.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.35.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -767.69.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.75.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.01.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.8.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.77.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.53.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.63.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.34.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -771.31.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.05.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.02.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.72.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.87.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.9.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.42.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.49.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.67.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.88.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.81.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.2.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.75.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.74.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.53.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.56.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.01.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.87.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.14.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.92.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.3.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.12.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.13.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.3.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.9.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.59.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.71.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.71.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.54.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.05.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.26.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.87.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.28.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.25.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.65.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.67.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.62.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.58.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -773.76.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.03.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -771.09.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.88.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.7.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.62.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -771.85.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.32.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.1.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.28.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.41.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.21.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.42.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.21.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.43.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.74.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.8.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.8.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -769.73.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.53.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.49.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.54.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.33.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.1.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.0.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.68.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.82.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.29.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.96.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.21.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.26.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.05.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.5.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.51.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.12.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.13.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.49.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.71.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.48.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.94.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.54.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.86.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.67.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.04.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.8.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.8.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.41.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.01.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.37.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.58.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.14.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.39.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.41.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.32.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.71.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.57.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.1.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.99.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.24.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.89.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.83.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.16.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.6.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.06.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.55.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.02.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.93.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.59.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.74.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.13.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.4.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.86.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.01.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.71.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.86.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.72.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.14.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.71.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.9.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.78.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.18.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.88.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.72.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.86.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.09.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.84.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.83.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.17.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.77.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.33.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.37.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.69.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.23.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.5.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.65.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.62.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.29.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.36.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.61.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.71.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.56.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.43.
+Path followed at iteration 74 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.3.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.88.
+Path followed at iteration 75 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.57.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.09.
+Path followed at iteration 76 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.09.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.37.
+Path followed at iteration 77 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.97.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.93.
+Path followed at iteration 78 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.52.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.99.
+Path followed at iteration 79 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.7.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.21.
+Path followed at iteration 80 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.04.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.23.
+Path followed at iteration 81 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.78.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.87.
+Path followed at iteration 82 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.14.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.09.
+Path followed at iteration 83 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.15.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.44.
+Path followed at iteration 84 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.25.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.15.
+Path followed at iteration 85 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.03.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.24.
+Path followed at iteration 86 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.44.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.26.
+Path followed at iteration 87 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.31.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.58.
+Path followed at iteration 88 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.14.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.58.
+Path followed at iteration 89 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.43.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.88.
+Path followed at iteration 90 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.91.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.84.
+Path followed at iteration 91 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.33.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.22.
+Path followed at iteration 92 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.04.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.28.
+Path followed at iteration 93 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.37.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.37.
+Path followed at iteration 94 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.14.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.81.
+Path followed at iteration 95 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.92.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.27.
+Path followed at iteration 96 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.46.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.87.
+Path followed at iteration 97 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.52.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.6.
+Path followed at iteration 98 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.98.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.53.
+Path followed at iteration 99 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.88.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.49.
+Path followed at iteration 100 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.31.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.46.
+Path followed at iteration 101 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.23.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.12.
+Path followed at iteration 102 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.5.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.92.
+Path followed at iteration 103 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.77.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.24.
+Path followed at iteration 104 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.42.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.34.
+Path followed at iteration 105 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.39.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.36.
+Path followed at iteration 106 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.92.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.58.
+Path followed at iteration 107 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.23.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.78.
+Path followed at iteration 108 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.65.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.69.
+Path followed at iteration 109 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.44.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.96.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.11.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.68.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.79.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.29.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.75.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.88.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.41.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.83.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.83.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.92.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.74.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.42.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.52.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.94.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.63.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.56.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.44.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.28.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.17.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.97.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.43.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.26.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.05.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.04.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.4.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.68.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.99.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.4.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.76.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -884.06.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.37.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.46.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.05.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.63.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.01.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.96.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.54.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.49.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.74.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.17.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.14.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.73.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.23.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.25.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.01.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.94.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.38.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.95.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.44.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.26.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.49.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.88.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.6.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.52.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.75.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.58.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.37.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.36.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.34.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.16.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.52.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.46.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.94.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.84.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.28.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.24.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.52.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.61.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.48.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.41.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.46.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.48.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.05.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -939.99.Path followed at iteration 110 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.39.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.56.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.32.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.67.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.2.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.31.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.07.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.27.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.93.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.76.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.65.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.49.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.32.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.65.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.94.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.2.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.36.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.01.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.86.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.42.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.03.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.63.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.08.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.16.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.14.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.01.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.43.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.53.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.55.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.14.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.29.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.48.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.54.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -937.81.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.8.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.56.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.49.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.06.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.19.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.06.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.7.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.03.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.0.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.71.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.46.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.16.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.35.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.97.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.13.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.26.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.28.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.35.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.23.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.12.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.48.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.84.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.25.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.53.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.51.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.15.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.02.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.13.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.07.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.39.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.71.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.36.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.43.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.89.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.88.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.87.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.2.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.18.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.78.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.38.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.68.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.85.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.47.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.75.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.48.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.62.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.19.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.48.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.94.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.39.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.85.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.6.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.2.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.68.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.47.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.51.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.33.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.36.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.53.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.95.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.65.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.79.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.59.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.93.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.18.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.28.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.2.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.05.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.41.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.48.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.34.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.09.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.36.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.01.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.99.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.71.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.72.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.97.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.35.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.62.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.58.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.57.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.65.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.1.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.8.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.19.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.31.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.48.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.34.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.47.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.52.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.76.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.39.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.68.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.57.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.35.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.35.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.15.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.55.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.41.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.48.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.71.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.98.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.92.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.18.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.01.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.33.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.79.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.62.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.82.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.17.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.47.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.2.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.05.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.37.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.35.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.76.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.88.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.35.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.52.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.66.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.3.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.22.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.86.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.02.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.67.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.42.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.61.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.74.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.19.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.51.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.46.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.58.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.58.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.08.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.13.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.17.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.87.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.51.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -916.2.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.85.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.82.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.1.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.1.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.59.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.71.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.42.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.21.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.77.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.1.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.11.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.73.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.17.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.79.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.25.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.7.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.27.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.68.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.45.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.02.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.37.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.86.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.47.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.16.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.63.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.09.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.89.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.7.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.41.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.86.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.1.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.12.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.72.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.06.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.47.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.13.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.44.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.95.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.25.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.8.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.23.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.86.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.39.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -895.9.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -904.73.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.0.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.23.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.82.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.56.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.72.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.99.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.7.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.95.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.17.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.42.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.34.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.63.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.19.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.81.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.5.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.49.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.43.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.51.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.83.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.93.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.59.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.2.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.34.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.46.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.09.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.05.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.96.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.08.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.48.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.76.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.8.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.17.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.36.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.11.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.68.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.41.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.14.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.02.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.75.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.5.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.79.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.43.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.16.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -771.84.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.22.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.82.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.8.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.8.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.92.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.09.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.36.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.6.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.01.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.91.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.56.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.11.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.44.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.09.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.04.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.45.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.87.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.89.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.48.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.73.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.78.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.18.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.29.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.93.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.55.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.62.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.48.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.18.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.34.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.99.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.2.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.95.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.15.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.33.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.41.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.69.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.21.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.37.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.27.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.59.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.92.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.44.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.19.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.59.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.95.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.03.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.99.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.88.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.06.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.06.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.47.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.9.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.67.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.95.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.91.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.78.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.13.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.61.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.61.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.73.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.47.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.05.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.0.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.79.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.79.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.64.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.79.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.37.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.63.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.65.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.83.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.33.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.77.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.2.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.81.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.9.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.83.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.74.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.47.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.7.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.21.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.4.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.93.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.74.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.09.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.6.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.37.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.83.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.02.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.92.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.82.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.91.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.17.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.05.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.6.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.04.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.35.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.56.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.09.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.76.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.1.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.13.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.33.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.85.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.61.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.71.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.96.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.76.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.68.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.36.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.58.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.48.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.52.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.08.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.35.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.18.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.25.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.01.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.99.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.87.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.66.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.4.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.0.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.11.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.87.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.82.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.37.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.24.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.07.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.25.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.14.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.04.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.53.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.76.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.83.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.68.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.37.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.48.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.7.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.71.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.58.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.45.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.37.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.98.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.1.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.47.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.96.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.5.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.2.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.52.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.99.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.96.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.65.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.64.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.56.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.99.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.16.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.54.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.33.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.15.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.43.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.09.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.94.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.47.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.45.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.95.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.8.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.98.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.13.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.65.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.55.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.34.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.41.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.83.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.16.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.1.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.82.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.53.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.96.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.67.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.72.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.12.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.57.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.24.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.18.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.92.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.3.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.03.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.87.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.99.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.75.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.53.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.25.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.11.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.1.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.93.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.79.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.11.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.18.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.63.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.32.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.56.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.44.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.27.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.36.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.38.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.44.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.59.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.76.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.55.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.69.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.73.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.71.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.13.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.55.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.68.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.67.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.45.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.54.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.8.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.81.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.52.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.48.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.23.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.11.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.63.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.96.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.53.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.29.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.3.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.53.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.7.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.23.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.17.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.24.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.05.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.05.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.89.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.8.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.05.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.12.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.81.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.53.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.02.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.73.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.86.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.33.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.21.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.87.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.03.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.91.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.4.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.46.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.32.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.72.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.72.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.82.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.75.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.42.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.73.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.51.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.24.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.92.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.36.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.78.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.03.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.39.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.51.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.68.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.93.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.84.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.81.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.84.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.21.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.17.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.77.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.53.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.24.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.52.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.28.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.57.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.39.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.77.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.1.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.07.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.31.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.61.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.8.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.54.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.77.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.8.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.58.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.09.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.18.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.72.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.16.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.53.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.57.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.55.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.25.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.1.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.02.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.7.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.72.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.81.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.81.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.66.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.77.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.29.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.46.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.59.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.48.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.05.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.5.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.04.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.85.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.72.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.5.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.78.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.92.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.82.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.45.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.76.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.03.
+Path followed at iteration 110 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.33.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.12.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.81.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.45.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.42.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.55.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.34.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.18.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.08.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.2.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.11.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.81.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.21.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.74.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.94.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.64.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.06.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.93.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.09.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.09.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.16.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.83.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.7.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.59.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.56.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.47.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.33.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.19.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.17.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.83.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.5.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.27.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.49.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.74.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.51.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.61.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.56.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.04.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.87.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.84.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.62.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.35.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.2.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.99.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.63.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.01.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.69.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.76.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.47.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.81.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.08.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.55.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.58.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.63.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.73.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.24.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.54.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.84.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.88.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.61.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.81.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.24.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.96.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.52.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.33.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.37.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.34.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.62.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.97.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.46.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.72.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.8.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.33.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.79.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.63.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.11.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.91.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.91.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.22.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.15.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.5.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.46.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.65.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.55.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.65.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.76.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.8.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.75.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.29.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.12.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.91.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.52.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.47.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.29.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.29.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.19.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.66.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.41.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.02.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.29.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.9.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.35.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.65.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.91.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.26.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.4.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.23.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.76.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.53.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.58.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.77.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -842.52.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.9.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.72.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.92.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.84.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.84.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.86.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.43.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.29.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.75.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.8.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.1.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.84.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.41.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.87.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.56.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.99.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.87.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.68.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.08.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.1.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.79.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.95.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.0.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.82.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.79.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.8.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.96.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.1.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.23.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.23.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.83.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.03.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.25.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.28.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.25.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.21.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.79.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.61.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.27.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.19.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.51.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.17.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.49.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.31.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.59.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.31.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.31.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.3.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.81.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.67.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.7.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.73.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.42.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.68.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.95.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.07.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.24.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.24.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.08.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.62.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.28.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.64.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.74.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.86.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.2.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.65.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.32.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.79.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.3.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.2.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.72.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.73.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.87.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.14.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.36.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.44.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.66.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.61.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.7.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.01.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.08.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.38.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.19.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.79.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.57.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.05.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.68.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.39.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.54.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.89.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.7.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.63.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.9.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.71.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.99.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.33.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.5.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.51.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.72.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.12.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.66.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.85.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.92.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.16.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.25.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.55.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.61.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.31.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.61.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.25.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.57.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.85.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.33.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.29.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.95.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.24.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.37.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.02.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.9.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.72.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.05.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.63.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.1.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.0.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.18.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.21.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.87.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.57.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.39.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.72.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.66.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.97.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.28.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.03.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.77.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.26.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.67.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.63.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.13.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.92.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.56.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.54.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.12.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.69.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.59.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.97.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.68.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.53.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.35.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.74.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.8.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.47.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.71.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.16.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.65.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.69.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.56.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.87.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.63.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.06.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.85.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.27.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.5.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.95.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.22.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.42.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.0.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.71.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.12.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.43.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.61.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.12.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.1.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.33.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.42.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.49.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.67.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.24.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.59.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.36.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.76.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.19.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.41.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.78.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.72.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.27.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.4.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.66.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.91.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.05.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.32.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.95.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.19.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.26.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.43.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.37.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.65.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.5.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.22.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.29.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.25.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.86.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.83.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.81.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.22.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.52.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.11.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.88.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.96.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.39.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.31.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.31.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.54.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.91.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.76.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.66.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.11.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.87.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.93.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.22.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.1.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.86.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.81.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.86.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.82.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.0.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.96.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.68.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.1.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.1.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.93.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.12.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.23.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.47.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.26.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.46.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.42.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.93.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.49.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.77.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.15.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.55.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.04.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.02.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.78.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.64.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.02.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.7.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.39.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.12.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.94.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.07.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.55.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.06.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.8.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.63.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.04.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.89.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.37.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.28.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.79.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.85.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.7.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.75.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.23.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.66.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.52.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.24.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.35.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.99.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.6.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.24.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.36.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.28.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.28.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.85.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.94.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.38.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.86.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.53.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.2.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.37.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.41.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.36.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.2.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.59.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.76.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.42.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.32.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.85.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.83.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.02.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.63.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.54.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.88.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.75.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.0.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.71.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.61.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.24.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.55.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.94.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.28.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.46.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.79.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.51.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.52.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.78.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.13.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.41.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.86.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.8.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.71.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.38.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.92.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.39.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.94.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.06.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.28.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.9.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.14.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.17.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.05.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.59.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.32.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.84.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.45.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.68.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.64.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.48.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.57.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.93.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.06.
+Path followed at iteration 111 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.27.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.67.
+Path followed at iteration 112 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.57.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.64.
+Path followed at iteration 113 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.2.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.79.
+Path followed at iteration 114 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.57.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.91.
+Path followed at iteration 115 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.76.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.43.
+Path followed at iteration 116 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.03.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.56.
+Path followed at iteration 117 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.53.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.27.
+Path followed at iteration 118 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.38.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.33.
+Path followed at iteration 119 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.2.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -770.54.
+Path followed at iteration 120 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.65.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.41.
+Path followed at iteration 121 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.38.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.29.
+Path followed at iteration 122 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.36.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -777.53.
+Path followed at iteration 123 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.39.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -776.09.
+Path followed at iteration 124 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.5.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.35.
+Path followed at iteration 125 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.3.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.14.
+Path followed at iteration 126 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.34.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.81.
+Path followed at iteration 127 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.08.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.1.
+Path followed at iteration 128 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.73.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.27.
+Path followed at iteration 129 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.12.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.66.
+Path followed at iteration 130 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -920.48.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.24.
+Path followed at iteration 131 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.89.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.93.
+Path followed at iteration 132 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.37.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.11.
+Path followed at iteration 133 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.1.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.81.
+Path followed at iteration 134 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.76.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.76.
+Path followed at iteration 135 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.79.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.61.
+Path followed at iteration 136 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.64.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.9.
+Path followed at iteration 137 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.16.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.8.
+Path followed at iteration 138 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.0.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.21.
+Path followed at iteration 139 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.51.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.16.
+Path followed at iteration 140 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.51.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.33.
+Path followed at iteration 141 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.57.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.56.
+Path followed at iteration 142 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.22.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.44.
+Path followed at iteration 143 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.57.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.62.
+Path followed at iteration 144 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.82.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.35.
+Path followed at iteration 145 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.67.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.8.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.7.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.64.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.87.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.06.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.5.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -770.54.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.81.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.22.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.69.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.59.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.77.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.88.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.31.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.91.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.17.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.79.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.82.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.6.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.96.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.93.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.01.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.07.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.91.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.09.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.16.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.89.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.32.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.44.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.77.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.09.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.58.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.93.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.14.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.57.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.27.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.4.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.55.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.96.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.87.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.57.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.67.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.04.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.38.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.56.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.19.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.96.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.63.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.42.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.94.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.56.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.51.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.48.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.7.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.02.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.02.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.1.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.5.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.84.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.97.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.53.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.93.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.43.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.12.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.15.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.77.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.95.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.3.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.19.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.61.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -842.87.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.19.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.37.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.09.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.31.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.54.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.79.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.16.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.97.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.09.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.32.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.45.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.96.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.4.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.71.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.65.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.08.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.62.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.76.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.72.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.25.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.04.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.24.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.72.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.25.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.1.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.09.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.45.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.38.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.46.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.08.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.99.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.98.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.27.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.72.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.06.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.4.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.53.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.11.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.62.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.76.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.35.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.36.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.57.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.91.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.46.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.39.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.22.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.59.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.52.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.39.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.35.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.28.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.92.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.4.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.44.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.92.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.15.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.09.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.93.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.31.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.28.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.01.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.98.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.8.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.67.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.9.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.16.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.86.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.57.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.25.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.63.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.33.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.71.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.59.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.24.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.13.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.14.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.9.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.1.
+Path followed at iteration 146 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.39.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.18.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.3.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.03.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.91.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.58.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.07.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.73.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.44.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.25.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.34.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.64.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.8.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.02.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.37.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.43.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.2.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.86.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.63.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.74.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.31.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.74.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.02.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.8.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.34.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.32.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.41.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.45.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.59.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.13.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.46.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.33.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.34.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.67.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.31.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.97.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.1.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.55.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.12.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.83.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.51.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.23.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.33.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.89.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.32.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.91.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.78.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.51.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.46.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.5.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.68.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.31.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.25.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.78.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.88.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.26.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.52.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.88.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.46.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.23.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.37.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.27.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.43.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.07.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.66.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.38.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.03.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.82.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.13.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.44.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.71.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.19.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.89.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -884.0.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.56.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.05.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.01.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -873.57.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.44.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.05.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.65.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.59.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.34.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.06.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.09.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.19.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.2.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.7.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.51.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.63.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.67.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.56.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.5.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.36.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.6.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.94.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.02.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.66.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.39.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.6.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.57.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.98.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -872.71.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.04.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.71.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.15.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.37.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.9.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.46.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.02.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.07.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.39.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.07.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.63.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.44.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.05.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.0.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.7.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.36.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.48.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.27.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.07.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.55.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -887.81.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.14.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.47.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.26.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.24.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.92.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.39.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.38.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.99.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.37.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.61.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.59.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.52.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.85.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.76.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.37.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.22.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.66.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.26.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.54.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.91.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.71.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.59.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.62.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.69.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.43.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.32.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.26.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.27.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.74.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.98.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.71.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.67.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.48.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.78.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.73.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.11.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.92.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.54.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.17.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.58.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.46.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.87.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.2.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.19.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.72.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.94.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.16.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.55.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.7.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.39.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.53.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.41.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.53.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.19.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.3.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.24.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.0.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.68.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.17.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.97.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.43.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.39.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.89.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.57.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.01.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.58.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.41.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.04.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.7.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.15.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.91.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.91.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.69.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.84.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.28.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.84.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.89.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.08.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.58.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.46.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.83.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.09.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.91.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.59.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.92.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.7.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.43.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.03.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.08.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.1.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.38.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.25.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.32.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.15.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.08.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.27.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -779.29.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.63.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.83.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.59.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.69.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.75.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.51.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.09.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.03.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.86.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.83.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.27.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.25.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.86.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.87.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -783.32.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.27.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.06.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.38.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.01.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.24.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.63.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.0.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.76.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.47.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.3.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.88.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.99.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.72.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.12.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.06.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.23.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.76.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.06.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.34.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.42.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.01.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.87.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.36.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.42.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.01.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.18.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.89.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.14.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.27.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.3.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.25.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.64.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.03.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.72.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.55.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.51.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.47.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.93.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.25.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.16.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.55.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.19.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.68.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.82.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.17.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.67.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.77.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.01.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.23.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.91.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.63.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.25.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.74.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.44.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.83.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.38.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.87.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.13.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.58.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.73.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.42.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.0.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.43.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.04.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.43.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.66.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.68.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.81.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.73.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.93.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.75.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.56.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.63.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.32.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.09.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.07.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.21.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.23.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.7.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.06.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.78.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.8.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.94.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.45.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.95.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.98.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.49.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.6.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.21.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.34.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.02.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.71.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.99.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.18.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.44.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.51.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.95.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.34.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.88.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.61.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.74.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.88.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.9.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.56.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.07.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.45.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.12.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.61.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.47.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.67.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.57.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.05.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.82.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.64.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.96.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.71.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.84.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.97.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.49.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.24.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.36.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.77.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.85.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.78.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.15.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.67.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.34.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.08.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.37.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.87.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.07.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.82.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.33.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.72.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.97.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.07.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.6.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.88.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.58.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.89.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.76.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.33.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.94.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.37.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.51.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.51.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.47.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.56.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.55.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.04.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.49.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.05.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.05.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.47.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.22.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.66.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.14.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.38.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.53.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.72.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.81.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.27.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.99.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.55.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.89.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.55.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.74.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.86.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.09.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.93.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.16.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.82.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.98.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.87.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.52.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.04.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.72.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.56.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.58.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.78.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.06.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.15.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.43.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.75.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.44.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.29.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.7.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.32.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.29.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.86.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.99.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.39.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.85.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.86.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.69.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.81.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.37.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.02.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.89.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.09.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.96.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.93.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.58.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.57.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.03.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.79.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.63.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.55.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.77.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.9.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.05.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.9.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.29.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.95.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.64.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.26.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.4.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.33.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.89.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.68.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.65.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.88.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.95.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.39.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.91.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.02.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.39.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.61.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.55.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.3.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.16.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.62.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.42.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.77.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.91.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.87.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.56.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.97.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.18.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.03.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.76.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.48.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.9.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.78.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.91.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.06.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.1.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.32.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.15.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.93.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.12.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.36.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.75.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.25.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.9.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.38.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.63.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.87.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.78.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.06.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.54.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.02.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.97.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.35.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.4.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.16.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.36.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.02.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.66.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.02.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.55.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.92.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.85.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.0.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.4.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.45.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.82.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.01.
+Path followed at iteration 147 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.34.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.96.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.97.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.94.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.38.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.92.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.1.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.65.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.36.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.65.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.56.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.41.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.9.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.23.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.12.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.36.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.38.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.75.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.43.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.97.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.99.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.13.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.08.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.37.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.39.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.89.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.32.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.8.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.15.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.39.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.34.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.31.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.46.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.21.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.83.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.98.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.26.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.17.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.9.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.2.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.83.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.96.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.43.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.0.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.75.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.81.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.48.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.88.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.38.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.75.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.58.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.5.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.07.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.77.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.91.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.96.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.71.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.53.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.84.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.17.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.68.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.52.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.35.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.23.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.53.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.54.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.16.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.67.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.97.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.14.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.66.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.07.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.27.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.09.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.63.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.34.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.41.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.91.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.65.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.91.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.32.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.5.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.02.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.44.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.4.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.04.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.46.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.71.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.29.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.83.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.51.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.35.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.33.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.02.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.28.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.08.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.09.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.19.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.41.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.98.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.66.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.45.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.95.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.5.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.36.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.29.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.7.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.22.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.4.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.13.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.65.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.65.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.43.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.94.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.56.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.85.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.2.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.69.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.01.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.46.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.55.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.31.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.27.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.98.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.38.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.72.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.39.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.0.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.72.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.21.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.27.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.56.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.57.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.05.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.48.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.93.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -842.26.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.45.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.01.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.29.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.54.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.29.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.92.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.1.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.37.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.63.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.2.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.36.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.63.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.95.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.35.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.2.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.7.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.48.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.64.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.02.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.44.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.18.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.05.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.02.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.02.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.6.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.82.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.13.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.15.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.31.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.07.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.17.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.5.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.78.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.93.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.39.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.31.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.69.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.51.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.45.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.69.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.38.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.83.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.18.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.27.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.53.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.83.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.28.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.24.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.38.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.89.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.84.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.31.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.07.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.96.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.46.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.12.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.55.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.99.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.48.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.65.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.39.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.08.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.81.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.69.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.78.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.79.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.08.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.99.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.1.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.94.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.06.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.47.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.5.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.89.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.96.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.08.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.88.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.25.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.75.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.26.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.63.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.71.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.9.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.16.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.47.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.88.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.14.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.92.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.73.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.44.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.76.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.44.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.89.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.98.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.82.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.55.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.21.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.13.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.04.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.94.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.58.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.04.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.75.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.98.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.73.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.14.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.4.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.23.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.37.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.94.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.01.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.4.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.32.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.52.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.59.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.66.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.57.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.83.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.44.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.55.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.37.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.89.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.98.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.61.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.19.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.77.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.78.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.33.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.29.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.55.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.92.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.67.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.86.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.9.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.27.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.31.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.2.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.34.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.31.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.62.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.7.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.32.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.16.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.58.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.12.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.02.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.16.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.37.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.07.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.52.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.24.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.27.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.38.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.4.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.65.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.82.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.5.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.36.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.15.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.54.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.18.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.48.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.63.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.86.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.94.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.52.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.44.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.42.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.22.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.78.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.09.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.74.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.24.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.81.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.19.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.85.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.41.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.93.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.59.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.35.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.41.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.7.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.62.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.82.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.44.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.9.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.59.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.45.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.12.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.51.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.04.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.36.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.3.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.56.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.37.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.36.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.68.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.41.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.44.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.97.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.41.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.19.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.68.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.34.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.37.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.59.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.61.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.34.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.62.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.86.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.75.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.88.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.56.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.77.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.27.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.75.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.25.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.06.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.38.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.39.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.21.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.63.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.82.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.39.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.27.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.64.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.5.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.07.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.33.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.8.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.73.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.8.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.12.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.32.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.46.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.67.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.75.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.29.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.85.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.27.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.27.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.83.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.09.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.37.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.21.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.38.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.32.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.95.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.7.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.82.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.77.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.28.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.69.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.97.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.68.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.6.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.33.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.62.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.09.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.69.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.59.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.21.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.55.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.44.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.16.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.87.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.9.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.49.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.5.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.22.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.73.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.65.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.64.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.15.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.72.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.32.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.46.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.77.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.7.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.81.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.4.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.38.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.86.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.12.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.21.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.35.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.41.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.6.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.49.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.95.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.63.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.45.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.84.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.98.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.49.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.61.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.81.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.82.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.18.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.59.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.95.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.29.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.02.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.39.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.22.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.83.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.97.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.98.
+Path followed at iteration 148 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.27.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.05.
+Path followed at iteration 149 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.94.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.09.
+Path followed at iteration 150 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.43.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.06.
+Path followed at iteration 151 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.32.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.15.
+Path followed at iteration 152 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.03.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.72.
+Path followed at iteration 153 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.85.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.59.
+Path followed at iteration 154 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.23.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.68.
+Path followed at iteration 155 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.59.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.04.
+Path followed at iteration 156 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.86.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.82.
+Path followed at iteration 157 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.46.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.33.
+Path followed at iteration 158 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.35.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.55.
+Path followed at iteration 159 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.41.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.53.
+Path followed at iteration 160 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.82.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.12.
+Path followed at iteration 161 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.45.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.08.
+Path followed at iteration 162 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.16.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.5.
+Path followed at iteration 163 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.17.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.78.
+Path followed at iteration 164 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.5.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.13.
+Path followed at iteration 165 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.58.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.79.
+Path followed at iteration 166 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.1.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.48.
+Path followed at iteration 167 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.08.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.01.
+Path followed at iteration 168 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.27.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.69.
+Path followed at iteration 169 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.72.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.5.
+Path followed at iteration 170 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.53.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.92.
+Path followed at iteration 171 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.33.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.4.
+Path followed at iteration 172 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.35.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.18.
+Path followed at iteration 173 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.98.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.86.
+Path followed at iteration 174 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.17.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.77.
+Path followed at iteration 175 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.11.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.3.
+Path followed at iteration 176 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.54.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.83.
+Path followed at iteration 177 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.16.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.73.
+Path followed at iteration 178 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.64.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.27.
+Path followed at iteration 179 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.75.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.92.
+Path followed at iteration 180 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.84.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.97.
+Path followed at iteration 181 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.76.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.01.
+Path followed at iteration 182 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.36.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.44.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.07.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.39.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.27.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.42.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.6.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.53.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.41.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.1.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.86.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.23.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.46.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.44.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.21.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.01.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.51.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.88.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.38.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.33.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.2.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.46.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.6.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.84.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.64.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.77.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.68.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.23.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.05.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.51.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.44.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.12.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.48.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.33.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.87.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.98.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.08.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.48.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.95.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.34.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.94.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.49.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.35.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.07.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.32.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.86.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.98.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.52.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.41.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.83.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.61.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.22.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.34.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.49.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.72.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.04.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.32.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.02.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.19.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.68.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.99.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.14.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.08.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.97.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.91.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.65.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.19.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.57.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.01.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.43.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.59.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.31.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.37.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.31.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.54.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.35.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.59.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.95.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.84.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.67.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.8.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.32.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.42.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.34.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.53.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.35.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.51.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.85.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.6.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.1.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.6.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.29.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.93.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.67.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.08.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.87.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.45.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.42.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.31.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.0.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.04.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.14.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.61.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.49.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.45.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.52.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.9.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.82.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.65.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.13.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.05.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.2.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.09.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.4.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.0.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.38.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.85.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.41.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.41.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.86.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.02.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.73.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.59.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.8.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.45.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.67.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.9.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.49.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.4.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.45.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.09.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.32.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.82.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.68.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.45.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.39.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.17.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.98.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.15.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.63.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.34.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.52.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.56.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.9.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.24.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.32.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.27.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.43.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.69.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.64.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.36.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.21.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.96.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.11.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.17.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.09.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.39.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.94.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.15.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.85.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.77.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.34.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.88.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.21.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.38.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.06.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.18.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.84.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.07.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.98.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.12.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.28.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.68.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.42.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.33.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.74.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.49.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.89.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.11.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.64.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.02.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.27.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.99.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.16.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.05.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.63.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.73.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.36.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.1.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.79.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.21.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.53.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.36.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.77.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.2.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.43.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.37.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.59.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.26.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.28.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.47.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.62.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.28.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.12.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.06.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.45.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.46.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.07.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.1.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.81.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.36.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.23.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.1.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.51.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.07.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.32.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.5.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.15.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.96.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.79.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.16.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.01.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.37.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.45.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -886.18.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.36.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.47.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.99.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.88.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.68.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.01.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.57.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.98.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.31.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.89.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.37.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.16.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.28.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.51.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.28.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.09.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.2.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.57.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.24.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.6.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.18.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -885.04.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.83.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -871.58.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.94.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.99.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -877.51.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.91.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.15.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.66.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.76.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.03.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.2.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.86.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.54.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -883.19.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.8.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.57.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.37.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.15.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -868.3.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.62.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.22.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -882.64.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.21.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -887.05.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.48.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.83.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.4.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.41.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -876.91.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.01.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.21.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -876.2.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.32.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.29.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -869.77.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.12.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.18.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.95.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.16.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.48.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.81.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.04.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.83.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.12.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.77.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.55.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.03.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.69.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.02.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.08.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.35.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.21.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.4.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.76.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.67.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.49.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.4.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.26.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.94.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.35.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.12.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.27.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.02.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.0.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.15.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.17.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.18.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.68.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.83.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.13.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.87.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.86.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.14.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.36.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.41.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.79.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.96.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.9.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.22.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.94.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.33.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.38.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.95.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.99.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.34.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.64.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.81.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.16.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.73.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.44.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.77.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.06.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.63.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.36.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.54.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.86.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.5.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.36.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.96.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.01.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.9.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.57.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.4.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.1.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.6.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.86.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.22.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.96.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.3.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.83.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.83.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.44.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.21.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.38.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.48.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.33.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.15.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.85.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.28.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.05.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.7.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.37.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.05.
+Path followed at iteration 183 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.2.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.69.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.25.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.67.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.49.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.65.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.77.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.14.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.0.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.38.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.15.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.04.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.86.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.23.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.52.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.05.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.93.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.77.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.17.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.78.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.55.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.79.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.44.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.57.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.22.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.65.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.97.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.08.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.51.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.55.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.46.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.31.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.67.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.14.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.48.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.96.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.88.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.99.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.49.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -778.38.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.3.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.67.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.69.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.04.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.96.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.34.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.67.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.31.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.68.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.98.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.89.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.95.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.7.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.59.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.44.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.66.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.01.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.11.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.85.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.4.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.76.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.56.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.17.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.51.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.14.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.54.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.21.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.33.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.54.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.46.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.39.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.51.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.97.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.83.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.3.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.54.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.72.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.22.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.54.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.26.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.47.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.63.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.14.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.4.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.52.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.54.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.23.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.38.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.91.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.88.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.47.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.3.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.83.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.58.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.98.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.38.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.21.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.65.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.09.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.2.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.97.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.98.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.29.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.4.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.74.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.99.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.62.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.4.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.07.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.54.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.3.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.57.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.75.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.72.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.61.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.56.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.49.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.15.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.08.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.31.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.4.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.59.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.6.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.71.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.91.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.64.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.3.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.78.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.83.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.71.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.72.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.6.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.57.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.24.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.9.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.8.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.39.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.52.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.71.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.74.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.9.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.59.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.04.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.73.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.12.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.81.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.27.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.23.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.45.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.73.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.49.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.28.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.21.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.3.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.57.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.93.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.87.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.91.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.54.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.36.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.61.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.12.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.15.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.14.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.08.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.65.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.58.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.68.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.31.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.49.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.21.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.58.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.51.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.98.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.78.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.37.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.38.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.13.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.0.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.81.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.78.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.01.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.19.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.79.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.17.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.0.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.22.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.78.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.82.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.42.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.62.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.18.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.26.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.61.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.68.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.66.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.85.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.79.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.34.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.1.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.78.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.35.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.47.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.15.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.01.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.31.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.24.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.82.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.94.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.23.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.74.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.22.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.05.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.52.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.32.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.36.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.97.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.32.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.78.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.9.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.97.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.08.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.06.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.65.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.76.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.78.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.4.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.29.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.45.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.39.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.38.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.33.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.16.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.6.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.33.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.72.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.86.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.03.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.64.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.69.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.89.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.22.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.2.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.17.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.98.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.15.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.18.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.09.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.5.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.97.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.35.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.03.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.87.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.37.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.82.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.88.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.41.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.58.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.44.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.33.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.31.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.08.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.48.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.63.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.45.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.68.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.39.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.22.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.57.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.58.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.86.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.42.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.72.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.23.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.85.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.77.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.07.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.2.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.08.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.04.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.48.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.69.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.15.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.48.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.59.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.62.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.64.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.81.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.81.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.69.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.07.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.2.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.56.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.0.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.6.
+Path followed at iteration 184 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.56.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.45.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.26.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.8.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.53.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.34.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.36.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.4.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.38.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.23.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.72.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.43.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.74.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.66.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.58.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.9.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.45.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.87.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.19.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.47.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.56.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.05.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.82.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.27.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.68.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.52.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.64.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.82.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.47.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.0.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.59.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.18.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.29.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.15.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.24.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.12.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.35.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.67.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.46.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.15.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.15.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.87.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.29.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.26.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.13.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.98.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.07.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.4.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.94.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.6.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.13.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.78.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.5.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.23.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.55.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.9.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.66.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.07.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.75.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.85.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.21.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.2.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.83.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.69.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.76.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.16.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.1.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.22.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.05.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.34.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.97.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.35.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.05.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.73.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.76.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.06.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.23.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.48.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.39.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.25.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.22.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.91.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.53.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.15.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.83.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.31.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.19.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.84.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.33.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.68.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.92.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.33.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.33.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.04.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.27.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.95.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.61.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.11.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.51.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.85.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.03.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.11.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.83.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.45.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.97.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.93.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.81.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.47.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.41.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.88.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.87.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.26.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.93.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.98.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.46.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.66.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.24.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.7.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.13.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.8.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.88.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.96.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.04.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.05.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.5.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.41.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.32.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.2.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.47.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.08.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.48.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.46.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.39.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.09.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.65.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.57.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.84.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.46.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.54.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.59.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.29.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.72.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.5.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.11.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.7.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.92.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.62.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.58.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.51.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.9.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.18.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.24.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.66.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.57.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.89.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.83.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.17.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.65.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.51.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.67.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.54.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.55.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.17.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.08.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.14.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.6.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.95.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.41.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.39.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.83.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.95.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.67.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.78.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.26.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.03.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.39.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.67.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.57.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.51.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.39.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.8.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.96.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.24.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.79.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.73.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.01.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.8.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.25.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.78.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.28.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.15.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.02.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.18.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.18.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.81.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.34.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.03.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.33.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.04.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.07.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.95.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.04.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.53.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.95.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.91.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.74.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.04.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.91.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.88.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.41.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.24.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.88.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.46.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.12.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.24.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.87.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.57.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.99.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.71.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.25.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.6.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.61.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.36.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.11.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.53.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.59.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.81.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.24.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.3.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.8.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.66.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.63.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.61.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.55.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.74.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.9.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.38.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.79.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.51.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.53.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.49.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.58.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.1.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.25.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.37.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.61.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.54.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.57.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.82.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.21.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.87.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.7.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.16.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.94.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.58.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.55.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.16.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.88.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.8.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.59.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.44.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.32.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.84.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.88.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.63.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.21.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.37.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.69.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.26.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.78.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.2.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.67.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.78.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.79.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.41.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.02.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.05.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.95.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.87.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.71.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.93.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.16.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.42.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.27.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.42.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.79.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.63.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.48.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.58.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.68.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.27.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.21.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.66.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.23.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.79.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.64.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.13.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.22.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.96.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.98.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.13.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.03.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.25.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.15.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.09.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.75.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.07.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.6.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.81.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.54.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.12.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.45.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.3.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.0.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.25.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.93.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.14.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.27.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.3.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.61.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.39.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.32.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.03.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.26.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.15.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.24.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.86.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.89.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.62.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.08.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.9.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.93.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.6.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.75.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.78.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.56.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.01.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.89.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.07.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.47.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.64.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.39.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.91.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.6.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.97.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.36.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.95.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.56.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.6.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.09.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.49.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.26.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.01.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.43.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.41.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.73.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.44.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.58.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.04.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.47.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.87.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.39.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.11.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.53.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.53.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.86.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.83.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.94.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.48.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.51.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.83.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.61.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.59.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.98.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.14.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.13.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.37.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.89.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.76.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.15.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.0.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.93.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.64.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.71.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.34.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.99.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.3.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.02.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.4.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.36.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.38.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.22.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.07.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.14.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.74.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.49.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.26.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.78.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.21.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.89.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.38.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.61.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.36.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.39.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.7.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.3.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.99.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.59.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.86.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.57.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.83.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.05.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.05.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.22.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.76.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.2.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.78.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.79.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.59.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.74.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.98.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.64.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.36.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.56.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.02.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.63.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.37.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.54.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.89.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.58.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.02.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.06.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.16.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.98.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.27.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.29.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.68.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.75.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.03.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.34.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.33.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.46.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.8.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.28.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.99.
+Path followed at iteration 185 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.63.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.02.
+Path followed at iteration 186 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.77.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.71.
+Path followed at iteration 187 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.0.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.66.
+Path followed at iteration 188 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.73.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.91.
+Path followed at iteration 189 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.52.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.6.
+Path followed at iteration 190 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.89.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.61.
+Path followed at iteration 191 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.48.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.05.
+Path followed at iteration 192 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.89.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.14.
+Path followed at iteration 193 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.21.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.05.
+Path followed at iteration 194 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.53.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.45.
+Path followed at iteration 195 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.41.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.18.
+Path followed at iteration 196 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.19.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.89.
+Path followed at iteration 197 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.13.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.45.
+Path followed at iteration 198 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.54.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.49.
+Path followed at iteration 199 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.39.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.57.
+Path followed at iteration 200 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.63.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.95.
+Path followed at iteration 201 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.94.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.2.
+Path followed at iteration 202 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.26.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.86.
+Path followed at iteration 203 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.3.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.55.
+Path followed at iteration 204 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.61.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.91.
+Path followed at iteration 205 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.94.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.96.
+Path followed at iteration 206 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.08.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.25.
+Path followed at iteration 207 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.78.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.07.
+Path followed at iteration 208 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.63.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.58.
+Path followed at iteration 209 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.18.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.19.
+Path followed at iteration 210 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.92.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.08.
+Path followed at iteration 211 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.79.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.35.
+Path followed at iteration 212 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.41.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.25.
+Path followed at iteration 213 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.48.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.67.
+Path followed at iteration 214 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.59.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.82.
+Path followed at iteration 215 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.4.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.2.
+Path followed at iteration 216 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.49.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.52.
+Path followed at iteration 217 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.43.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.92.
+Path followed at iteration 218 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.16.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.06.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.68.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.17.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.62.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.12.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.26.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.04.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.3.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.4.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.74.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.44.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.17.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.41.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.16.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.15.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.23.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.95.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.31.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.24.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -842.94.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.41.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.43.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.98.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.37.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.55.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.08.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.66.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.83.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.48.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.86.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.45.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.42.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.98.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.63.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.88.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.91.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.6.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.89.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.75.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.84.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.65.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.3.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.02.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.17.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.26.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.63.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.29.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.04.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.52.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.53.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.12.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.87.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.54.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.49.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.21.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.76.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.77.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.07.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.11.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.8.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.67.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.38.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.02.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.57.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.74.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.13.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.88.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.82.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.1.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.68.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.23.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.11.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.29.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.18.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.21.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.28.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.09.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.78.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.19.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.26.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.6.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.65.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.28.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.23.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.32.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.8.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.02.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.84.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.59.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.11.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.01.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.33.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.35.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.21.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.18.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.51.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.96.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.86.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.72.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.54.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.4.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.79.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.84.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.25.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.4.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.72.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.11.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.13.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.23.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.82.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.11.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.59.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.83.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.15.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.11.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.73.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.32.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.45.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.48.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.26.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.08.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.16.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.98.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.99.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.09.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.28.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.91.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.52.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.24.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.57.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.16.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.25.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.58.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.49.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.01.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.09.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.91.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.81.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.49.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.04.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.63.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.26.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.92.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.81.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.1.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.58.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.15.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.35.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.7.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.14.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.49.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.98.
+Path followed at iteration 219 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.75.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.58.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.55.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.21.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.14.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.14.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.57.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.54.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.31.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.91.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.96.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.76.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.19.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.23.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.03.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.19.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.29.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.16.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.23.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.13.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.23.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.59.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.89.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.57.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.48.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.88.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.29.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.08.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.41.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.05.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.74.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.16.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.04.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.93.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.09.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.2.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.95.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.24.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.74.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.1.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.13.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.67.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.7.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.66.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.5.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.29.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.91.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.03.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.91.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.66.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.48.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.37.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.26.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.61.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.39.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.65.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.9.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.05.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.01.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.8.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.79.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.05.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.23.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.32.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.89.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.33.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.83.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.22.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.76.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.89.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.68.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.25.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.43.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.85.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.8.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.77.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.9.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.99.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.46.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.07.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.1.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.47.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.08.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.02.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.72.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.01.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.78.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.02.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.73.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.47.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.91.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.34.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.35.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.57.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.82.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.47.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.21.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.67.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.29.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.44.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.69.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.19.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.24.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.67.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.4.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.95.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.22.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.66.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.07.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.0.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.83.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.63.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.33.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.93.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.96.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.87.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.56.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.85.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.67.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.37.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.44.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.49.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -935.54.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.16.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.79.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -774.38.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.56.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.78.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -868.22.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -877.49.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.22.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -870.73.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -895.42.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -874.07.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.03.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.04.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -888.84.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.11.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -878.83.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -863.51.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -869.92.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.67.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.78.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.64.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -863.5.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.91.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.17.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.42.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.68.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.38.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.91.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.09.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.49.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.0.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.12.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.8.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.55.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.95.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.07.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.72.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.79.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.74.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.1.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.98.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.99.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.68.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.65.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.38.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.02.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.5.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.09.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.68.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.9.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.7.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.98.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.84.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.75.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -879.63.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.62.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.83.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.06.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.64.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.78.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.97.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.94.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.37.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.01.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.3.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.16.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.41.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.24.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.56.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.94.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.47.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.18.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.19.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.86.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.38.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.2.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.43.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.19.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.48.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.89.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.3.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.34.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.44.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.24.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.17.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.52.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.99.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.1.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.06.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.99.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.12.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.47.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.86.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.76.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.26.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.44.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.91.
+Path followed at iteration 220 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.67.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.4.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.52.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.71.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -781.48.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.17.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.61.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.47.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.6.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.23.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.02.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.82.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.43.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.8.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.55.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.63.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.98.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.05.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.04.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.1.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.97.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.47.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.48.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.9.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.06.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.18.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.2.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.73.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.78.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.43.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.61.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.68.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.43.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.85.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.17.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.89.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.98.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.86.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.15.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.67.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.96.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.11.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.65.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.23.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.22.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.33.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.27.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -782.14.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -897.61.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -775.79.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -876.56.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.68.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.23.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.91.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.93.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.56.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.82.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.85.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.49.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.28.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -875.12.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.06.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.8.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.66.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.24.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.18.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.62.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.83.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.38.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.92.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.73.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.47.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.94.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.72.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.64.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.73.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.05.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.15.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.23.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.04.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.73.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.27.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.51.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.17.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.5.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.07.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.98.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.66.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.77.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.61.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.42.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.92.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.63.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.11.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.28.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.31.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.53.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.99.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.08.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.43.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.44.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.07.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.28.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.66.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.43.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.44.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.45.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.87.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.63.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.11.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.23.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.9.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.85.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.51.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.63.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.68.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.54.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.1.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.46.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.04.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.41.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.42.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.35.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.48.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.64.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.01.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.8.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.24.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.54.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.07.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.34.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.15.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.41.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.77.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.16.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.15.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.65.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.21.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.02.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.11.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.1.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.17.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.92.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.38.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.83.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.33.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.18.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.62.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.04.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.83.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.17.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.62.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.19.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.07.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.57.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.81.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.73.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.62.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.61.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.47.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.7.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.32.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.69.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.0.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.06.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.68.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.39.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.22.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.8.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.12.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.15.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.04.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.64.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.59.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.89.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.4.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.53.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.81.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.82.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.51.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.1.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.14.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.7.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.76.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.06.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.96.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.64.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.67.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.31.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.72.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.96.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.2.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.69.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.22.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.46.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.39.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.58.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.12.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.38.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.46.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.44.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.34.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.31.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.55.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.77.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.74.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.93.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.3.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.13.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.39.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.89.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.11.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.85.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.49.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.89.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.8.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.81.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.31.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.25.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.18.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.12.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.74.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.47.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.83.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.31.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.43.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.04.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.68.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.04.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.79.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.0.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.91.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.55.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.88.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.6.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.76.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.18.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.21.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.07.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.9.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.2.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.71.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.55.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.36.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.89.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.34.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.98.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.7.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.49.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.12.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.25.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.66.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.39.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.38.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.15.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.88.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.51.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.3.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.63.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.05.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.08.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.06.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.76.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.54.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.67.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.78.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.61.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.07.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.85.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.27.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.07.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.37.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.57.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.98.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.47.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.02.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.86.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.35.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.35.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -784.49.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.66.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.33.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.5.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.58.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.43.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.78.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.26.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.07.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.96.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.31.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.43.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.57.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.05.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.54.
+Path followed at iteration 221 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.64.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.17.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.89.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.62.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.16.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.6.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.2.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.03.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.39.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.04.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.41.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.03.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.23.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.37.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.31.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.49.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.45.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.54.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.99.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.13.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.23.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.59.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.97.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.44.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.05.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.17.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.8.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.0.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.23.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.57.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.49.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.97.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.97.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.78.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.09.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.95.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.74.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.18.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.61.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.4.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.62.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.82.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.87.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.53.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.62.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.79.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.85.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.33.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.91.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.14.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.85.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.84.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.67.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.2.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.61.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.81.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.01.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.86.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.92.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.24.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.41.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.22.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.09.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.32.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.76.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.89.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.75.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.16.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.38.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.17.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.59.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.44.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.76.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.48.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.14.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.33.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.76.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.69.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.02.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.83.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.99.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.48.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.06.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.54.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.79.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.43.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.25.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.84.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.32.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.01.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.19.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.67.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.84.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.72.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.87.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.84.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.85.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.44.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.52.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.41.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.45.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.56.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.0.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.11.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.76.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.85.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.57.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.97.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.16.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.19.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.22.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.72.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.65.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.59.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.06.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.45.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.34.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.01.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.44.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.9.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.14.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.38.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.23.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.65.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.58.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.18.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.16.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.78.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.45.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.35.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.6.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.41.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.13.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.89.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.47.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.95.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.06.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.47.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.82.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.17.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.13.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.5.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.66.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.82.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.89.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.49.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.51.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.47.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.1.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.28.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.48.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.42.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.95.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.0.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.29.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.77.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.32.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.97.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.43.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.21.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.07.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.12.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.86.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.87.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.91.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.35.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.22.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.45.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.78.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.44.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.59.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.83.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.81.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.36.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.82.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.62.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.84.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.28.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.41.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.89.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.48.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.53.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.25.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.86.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.15.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.4.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.92.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.29.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.92.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.75.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.98.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.51.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.93.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.6.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.12.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.2.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.66.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.53.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.61.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.59.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.71.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.43.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.16.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.28.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.91.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.09.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.14.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.3.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.22.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.09.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.55.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.9.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.31.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.61.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.03.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.25.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.04.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.69.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.59.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.67.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.68.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.41.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.83.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.85.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.3.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.88.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.56.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.24.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.67.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.41.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.46.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.8.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.75.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.43.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.87.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.91.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.63.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.0.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.06.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.6.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.98.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.03.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.5.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.58.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.95.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.57.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.63.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.54.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.23.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.88.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.58.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.26.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.8.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.84.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.87.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.61.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.01.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.79.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.27.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.19.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.22.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.08.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.35.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.15.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.29.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.21.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.7.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.91.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.89.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.53.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.65.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.33.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.01.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.72.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.69.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.67.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.24.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.03.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.2.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.56.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.34.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.95.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.1.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.0.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.12.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.45.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.78.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.83.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.06.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.21.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.59.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.22.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.52.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.5.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.24.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.09.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.16.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.26.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.35.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.15.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.56.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.14.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.64.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.14.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.04.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.47.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.37.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.84.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.16.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.65.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.47.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.57.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.23.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.1.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.28.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.4.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.89.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.74.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.82.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.61.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.15.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.73.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.02.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.32.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.56.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.89.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.33.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.3.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.23.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.45.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.7.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.59.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.53.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.2.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.72.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.05.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.43.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.76.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.78.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.66.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.92.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.95.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.35.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.81.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.09.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.64.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.75.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.45.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.47.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.48.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.2.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.6.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.3.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.5.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.5.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.9.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.34.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.76.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.82.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.83.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.8.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.34.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.98.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.05.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.59.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.35.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.9.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.53.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.39.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.91.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.6.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.24.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.08.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.89.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.95.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.97.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.04.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.95.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.61.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.52.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.58.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.87.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.55.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.93.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.61.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.12.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.72.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.09.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.36.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.97.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.96.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.44.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.37.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.45.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.35.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.97.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.98.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.24.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.71.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.37.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.71.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.73.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.4.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.57.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.16.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.47.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.3.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.99.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.4.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.34.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.52.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.85.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.5.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.1.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.0.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.9.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.26.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.67.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.84.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.21.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.41.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.17.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.17.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.8.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.0.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.56.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.51.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.6.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.06.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.4.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.77.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.18.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.62.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.46.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.19.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.12.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.25.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.63.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.05.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.74.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.08.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.84.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.44.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.41.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.0.
+Path followed at iteration 222 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.12.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.17.
+Path followed at iteration 223 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.48.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.64.
+Path followed at iteration 224 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.61.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.36.
+Path followed at iteration 225 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.47.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.98.
+Path followed at iteration 226 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.35.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.32.
+Path followed at iteration 227 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.56.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.98.
+Path followed at iteration 228 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.3.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.62.
+Path followed at iteration 229 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.02.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.9.
+Path followed at iteration 230 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.24.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.73.
+Path followed at iteration 231 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.3.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.8.
+Path followed at iteration 232 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.37.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.56.
+Path followed at iteration 233 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.49.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.99.
+Path followed at iteration 234 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.26.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.03.
+Path followed at iteration 235 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.12.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.98.
+Path followed at iteration 236 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.68.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.21.
+Path followed at iteration 237 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.09.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.36.
+Path followed at iteration 238 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.72.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.56.
+Path followed at iteration 239 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.52.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.02.
+Path followed at iteration 240 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.28.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.25.
+Path followed at iteration 241 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.09.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.58.
+Path followed at iteration 242 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.81.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.11.
+Path followed at iteration 243 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.7.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.28.
+Path followed at iteration 244 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.2.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.24.
+Path followed at iteration 245 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.46.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.14.
+Path followed at iteration 246 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.79.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.75.
+Path followed at iteration 247 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.4.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.63.
+Path followed at iteration 248 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.45.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.83.
+Path followed at iteration 249 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.43.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.14.
+Path followed at iteration 250 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.66.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.96.
+Path followed at iteration 251 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.56.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.83.
+Path followed at iteration 252 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.81.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.36.
+Path followed at iteration 253 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.23.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.41.
+Path followed at iteration 254 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.43.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.87.
+Path followed at iteration 255 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.59.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.15.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.61.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.23.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.26.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.76.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.62.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.83.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.33.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.46.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.21.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.65.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.26.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.38.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.82.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.49.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.22.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.95.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.31.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.17.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.9.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.02.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.51.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.19.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.34.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.26.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.08.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.43.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.39.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.78.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.13.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.1.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.58.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.28.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.06.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.69.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.24.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.01.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.54.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.09.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.02.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.56.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.9.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.76.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.15.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.5.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.51.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.55.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.76.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.55.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.19.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.2.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.72.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.48.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.21.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.4.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.13.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.11.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.72.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.55.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.07.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.98.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.31.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.09.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.51.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.64.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.77.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.98.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.41.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.16.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.0.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.28.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.42.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.64.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.84.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.4.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.11.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.67.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.42.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.75.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.39.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.1.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.35.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.3.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.73.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.38.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.93.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.27.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.27.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.15.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.49.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.06.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.71.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.33.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.73.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.14.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.76.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.06.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.66.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.66.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.17.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.22.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.99.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.84.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.87.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.69.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.51.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.29.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.12.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.89.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.9.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.93.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.83.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.84.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.97.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.37.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.24.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.88.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.43.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.57.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.26.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.84.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.2.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.82.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.41.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.92.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.72.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.99.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.79.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.12.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.68.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.8.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.73.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.44.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.46.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.46.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.62.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.85.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.95.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.41.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.42.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.97.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.06.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.64.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.55.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.06.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.7.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.21.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.24.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.69.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.8.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.07.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.76.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.97.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.1.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.1.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.68.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.35.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.32.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.04.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.33.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.11.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.57.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.23.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.25.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.23.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.84.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.53.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.01.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.03.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.51.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.57.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.05.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.76.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.49.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.29.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.17.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.03.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.49.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.09.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.55.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.64.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.56.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.38.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.1.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.43.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.77.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.65.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.2.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.87.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.35.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.65.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.12.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.83.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.3.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.37.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.05.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.95.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.43.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.57.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.51.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.87.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.41.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.62.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.52.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.21.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.7.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.71.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.4.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.23.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.37.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.69.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.28.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.32.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.53.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.28.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.4.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.91.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.7.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.31.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.69.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.38.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.74.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.26.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.07.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.7.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.23.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.34.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.52.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.04.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.02.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.5.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.32.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.94.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -863.92.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -863.86.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.31.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -863.38.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.25.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.92.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.83.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.3.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.07.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.93.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -868.46.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.97.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.44.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.17.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -890.42.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -868.06.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.57.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -879.65.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -863.15.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.46.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -878.31.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.21.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.64.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.01.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.0.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.96.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.02.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.42.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.99.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.44.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.82.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.75.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.29.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.56.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.78.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.29.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.94.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.16.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -880.67.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -863.22.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -882.31.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.75.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -879.21.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.79.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -874.82.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.41.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -887.21.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.88.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -868.38.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -879.27.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.36.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.46.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.8.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.82.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.22.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.17.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.2.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -863.85.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -892.26.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.97.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.56.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.11.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.27.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.59.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.73.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.28.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.92.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.11.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.06.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.56.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.61.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.54.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -886.48.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.77.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.12.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.72.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.17.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.86.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.97.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.47.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.73.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.01.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.6.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.89.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.53.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.21.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.03.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.89.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.98.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.35.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -854.73.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.48.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.74.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.53.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.47.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.25.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.59.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.55.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.71.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.37.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.72.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.89.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -869.7.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.98.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.69.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.75.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -863.2.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.61.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.76.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.37.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.68.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.51.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.28.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.17.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.56.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.22.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.7.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -853.83.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.48.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.92.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.58.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.35.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.61.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.42.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.19.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -879.33.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.96.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.38.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.02.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.69.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.99.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.98.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.51.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.56.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.92.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.46.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -858.5.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.75.
+Path followed at iteration 256 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.69.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.31.
+Path followed at iteration 257 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.09.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.12.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.25.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.25.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.16.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.9.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.21.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.13.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.59.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.16.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.63.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.17.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.07.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.87.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.46.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.05.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.12.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.42.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.07.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.02.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -873.12.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.92.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.72.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.92.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.78.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.06.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.28.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.33.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.27.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.65.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.59.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.01.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.25.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.22.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.69.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.15.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.75.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.56.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.3.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -842.74.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.71.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.88.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.22.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.87.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.15.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -841.78.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.32.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.05.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.01.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.07.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.44.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.36.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.81.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -842.62.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.01.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.77.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.65.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.01.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.78.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.17.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.32.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.06.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.99.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.17.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.62.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -842.61.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.84.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.77.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.78.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.51.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.52.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -851.0.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.86.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.49.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.79.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.82.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.48.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.97.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.94.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.08.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.05.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.27.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.32.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.08.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.43.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.38.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.99.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.98.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.39.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.35.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.83.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.3.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.16.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.43.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.86.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.18.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.59.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.56.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.78.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.96.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.77.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.35.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.15.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.26.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.03.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.83.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.54.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.77.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.14.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.38.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.14.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.58.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.66.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.64.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.2.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.15.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.02.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.05.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.94.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.9.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.84.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.83.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.1.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.93.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.76.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.82.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.31.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.78.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.81.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.79.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.2.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.16.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.58.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.77.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.55.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.26.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.73.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.13.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.22.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.73.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.27.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.64.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.63.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.93.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.17.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.56.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.45.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.58.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.88.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.38.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.72.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.94.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.49.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.88.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.6.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.55.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.03.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.41.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.85.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.42.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.49.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.32.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.75.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.36.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.12.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.05.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.26.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.09.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.66.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.07.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.96.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.34.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.52.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.57.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.84.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.55.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.31.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.84.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.75.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.56.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.08.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.35.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.66.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.49.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.13.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.8.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.67.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.21.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.44.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.19.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.03.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.86.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.7.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.65.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.74.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.01.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.42.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.67.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.61.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.95.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.33.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.52.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.59.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.57.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.03.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.03.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.0.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.81.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.23.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.48.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.38.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.83.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.34.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.86.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.74.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.46.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.16.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.77.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.74.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.32.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.37.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.61.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.43.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.46.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.63.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.56.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.64.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.04.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.64.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.39.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.33.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.98.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.58.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.68.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.96.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.58.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.57.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.68.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.64.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.07.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.72.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.96.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.75.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.77.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.42.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.73.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.36.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.27.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.93.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.71.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.32.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.04.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.12.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.49.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.73.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.59.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.77.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.3.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.44.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.45.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.55.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.16.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.76.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.76.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.09.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.3.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.3.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.93.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.15.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.84.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.21.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.1.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.66.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.26.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.27.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.07.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.64.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.93.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.83.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.93.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.38.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.69.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.67.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.28.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.78.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.57.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.45.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.11.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.26.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.32.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.03.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.67.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.48.
+Path followed at iteration 258 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.96.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.25.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.89.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.09.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.23.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.48.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.54.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.43.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.0.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.53.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.09.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.14.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.26.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.52.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.05.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.69.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.84.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.25.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.19.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.66.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.98.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.27.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.92.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.19.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.46.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.21.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.98.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.06.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.68.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.65.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.16.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.14.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.71.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.42.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.32.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.69.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.66.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.5.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.5.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.44.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.85.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.47.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.3.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.25.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.79.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.06.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.41.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.4.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -785.13.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.82.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.97.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.96.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.68.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.47.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.66.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.16.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.22.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.08.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.29.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.39.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.75.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.26.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.35.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.66.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.27.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.3.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.47.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.85.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.4.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.58.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -780.8.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.51.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.59.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.32.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.59.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.13.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.41.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.89.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.79.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.37.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.63.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.23.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.82.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.1.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.42.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.29.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.87.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.16.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.37.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.79.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.79.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.23.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.28.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.33.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.68.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.67.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.5.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.76.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.1.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.07.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.7.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.75.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.84.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.05.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.18.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.49.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.62.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.1.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.5.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.74.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.52.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -832.7.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.62.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.59.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.99.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.47.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.87.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.77.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.68.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.88.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.29.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.93.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.6.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.93.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.73.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.69.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.24.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.81.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.94.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.58.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.75.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.59.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.86.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.45.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.86.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.32.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.68.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.87.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.09.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.66.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.48.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.16.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.25.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.09.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.83.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.95.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -837.64.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.35.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.76.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.39.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.43.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.12.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.08.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.78.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.91.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.13.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.7.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.76.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.67.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.47.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.36.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.26.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.08.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.35.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.03.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.07.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.05.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.34.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.26.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.11.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.23.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.85.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.11.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.87.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.2.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.62.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.21.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.01.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.13.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.15.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.66.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -829.62.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.97.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.79.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.27.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.13.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.06.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.16.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.03.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.31.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.08.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.42.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.55.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.7.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.68.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -826.66.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.07.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.77.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.32.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.15.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.84.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.08.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.17.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.88.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.66.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.61.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -850.76.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.83.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.36.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.1.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.79.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.51.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.64.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.62.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.6.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.16.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.07.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.18.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.09.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.55.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.75.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.01.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.41.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.87.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.23.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.21.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.22.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.61.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.3.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.69.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.56.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.61.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.1.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.06.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.46.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.98.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.99.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.5.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.46.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.8.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.57.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.12.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.66.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.04.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.53.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.18.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.45.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.17.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.95.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.44.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.22.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.61.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.67.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.05.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.77.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.32.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.86.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.73.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.21.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.54.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.03.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.9.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.46.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.18.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.34.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.7.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.98.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.27.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.54.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.63.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.57.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.49.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.89.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.23.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.52.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.76.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.52.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.4.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.72.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.89.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.57.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.39.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.69.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.58.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.44.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.23.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.42.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.08.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.42.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.18.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.17.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.6.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.91.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.89.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.18.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.47.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.54.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.62.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -842.15.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.99.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.67.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.11.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.12.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.78.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.0.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.27.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.6.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.69.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.88.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.4.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.0.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.04.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.96.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.53.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.84.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.92.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.56.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.47.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.31.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.54.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.14.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.22.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.45.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.92.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.5.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.01.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.56.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.65.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.5.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.43.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.84.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.71.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.38.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.46.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.2.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.0.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.67.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.72.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.78.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.76.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.61.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.17.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.9.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.78.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.57.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.36.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.37.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.51.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.58.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.49.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.84.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.82.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.21.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.7.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.47.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.51.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.9.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.44.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.74.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.1.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.58.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.28.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.59.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.24.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.24.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.91.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.38.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.92.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.48.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.55.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.09.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.37.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.4.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.1.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.87.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.19.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.15.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.22.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.29.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.04.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.83.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.19.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.43.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.19.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.03.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.15.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.57.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.12.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.89.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.49.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.61.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.63.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.69.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.1.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.3.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.78.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.7.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.06.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.4.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.82.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.38.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.42.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.14.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.97.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.48.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.36.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.17.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.03.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.74.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.78.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.0.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.93.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.74.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.13.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.45.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.98.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.35.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.98.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.69.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.86.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.8.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.24.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.29.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.36.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.92.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.22.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.27.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.03.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.36.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.41.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.02.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.36.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.93.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.6.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.13.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.28.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.92.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.91.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.11.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.98.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.57.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.89.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.27.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.74.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.0.
+Path followed at iteration 259 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.07.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.26.
+Path followed at iteration 260 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.08.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.21.
+Path followed at iteration 261 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.08.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.5.
+Path followed at iteration 262 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.29.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.46.
+Path followed at iteration 263 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.69.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.62.
+Path followed at iteration 264 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.04.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.39.
+Path followed at iteration 265 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.18.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.54.
+Path followed at iteration 266 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.03.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.05.
+Path followed at iteration 267 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.57.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.48.
+Path followed at iteration 268 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.25.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.98.
+Path followed at iteration 269 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.96.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.91.
+Path followed at iteration 270 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.44.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.31.
+Path followed at iteration 271 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.93.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.83.
+Path followed at iteration 272 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.79.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.85.
+Path followed at iteration 273 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.32.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.7.
+Path followed at iteration 274 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.07.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.91.
+Path followed at iteration 275 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.02.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.72.
+Path followed at iteration 276 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.04.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.5.
+Path followed at iteration 277 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.77.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.24.
+Path followed at iteration 278 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.34.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.86.
+Path followed at iteration 279 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.03.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.76.
+Path followed at iteration 280 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.39.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.04.
+Path followed at iteration 281 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -791.51.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.66.
+Path followed at iteration 282 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.03.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.55.
+Path followed at iteration 283 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.54.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -792.24.
+Path followed at iteration 284 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.19.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.14.
+Path followed at iteration 285 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.79.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -793.9.
+Path followed at iteration 286 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.31.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.16.
+Path followed at iteration 287 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.51.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.12.
+Path followed at iteration 288 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.14.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -799.26.
+Path followed at iteration 289 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.79.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.66.
+Path followed at iteration 290 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.8.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.07.
+Path followed at iteration 291 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.3.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -800.09.
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.27.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.18.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.63.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.6.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.25.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.61.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.94.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.0.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.56.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.36.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.22.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.14.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.24.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 7 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.46.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 7 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.59.
+
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.83.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -806.49.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.98.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.49.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.92.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -797.83.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.49.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.26.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.51.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.38.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.82.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -796.87.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.14.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 10 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.23.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 10 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.52.
+
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.88.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -835.08.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.86.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.17.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.39.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.48.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.12.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 3 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.66.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 3 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.51.
+
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.52.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.19.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.53.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.91.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -816.08.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -810.0.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.16.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -809.63.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.56.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.72.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.55.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.95.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.02.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 11 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.45.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 11 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.76.
+
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -838.09.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -843.61.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -856.5.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.38.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.94.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.09.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.14.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -848.38.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -849.94.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -842.34.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -845.53.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -846.9.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 12 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.63.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 12 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -847.87.
+
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.96.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.29.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.15.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.84.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.17.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -867.1.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -865.95.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.23.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.67.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -866.01.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -868.0.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -868.39.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 13 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -864.29.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 13 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.52.
+
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.45.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.22.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.03.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.08.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.87.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.16.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 6 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -811.8.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 6 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.13.
+
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.41.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.22.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.62.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -836.94.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.92.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.39.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 5 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.27.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 5 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -844.2.
+
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.34.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.78.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.86.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.0.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -875.76.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -862.15.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.05.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -860.21.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -861.77.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.06.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -855.19.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -863.52.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 15 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -857.01.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 15 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -859.59.
+
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.16.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.1.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.69.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.44.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.07.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -840.02.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -823.37.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 4 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -820.82.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 4 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.18.
+
+Path followed at iteration 292 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -830.6.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.69.
+Path followed at iteration 293 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -834.05.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -833.1.
+Path followed at iteration 294 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -839.8.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -852.46.
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.72.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.92.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.84.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -831.46.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -818.93.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.83.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -828.24.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 14 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -824.49.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 14 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.52.
+
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -827.03.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.65.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.95.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -802.52.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.68.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -801.63.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 2 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.69.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 2 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.24.
+
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.72.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -815.26.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.51.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -825.53.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.91.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -822.65.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 1 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.96.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 1 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -821.27.
+
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -788.48.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -807.95.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.59.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -790.76.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -808.69.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.94.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 8 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.66.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 8 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -789.0.
+
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -803.62.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -804.2.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -812.22.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.45.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -814.15.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.68.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -819.99.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 9 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.49.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 9 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.55.
+
+Path followed at iteration 295 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -813.94.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -798.84.
+Path followed at iteration 296 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -817.96.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -805.89.
+Path followed at iteration 297 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.08.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -786.92.
+Path followed at iteration 298 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -794.82.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 0 by ant 0 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -795.87.
+Path followed at iteration 299 on process 0 by ant 1 : [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22] with cost equal to -787.5.
+Le temps d'exécution total est 7226.175344705582 s.
+Le chemin optimal est [256, 512, 512, 224, 26, 22].
+Le throughput associé est alors 939.99 MPoints/s.